ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: SUNDAY, March 14, 1993                   TAG: 9303140163
SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL                    PAGE: A-1   EDITION: METRO 
SOURCE: The New York Times
DATELINE: THE MONSTROUS STORM OF MARCH 1993                                LENGTH: Medium


HOW STORM BECAME A MONSTER

more intense than some hurricanes, bigger than the legendary blizzard of March 1888 - is a classic East Coast winter cyclone, or low-pressure system. But this kind of cyclone has not been seen in a decade, and its scope and power have not been seen in a century or more.

"I guess it has happened, but not in modern history, and certainly nothing this late in the year, over such a wide area," said Paul G. Knight, a meteorologist at the Pennsylvania State University Weather Communications Group.

Combining the attributes of both hurricane and blizzard, the storm that lashed and buried a vast swatch of the eastern United States from the Gulf states to New England was born in the convergence of three innocuous little atmospheric disturbances that by themselves would have been little noted.

The major one, a cluster of thunderstorms, developed over the western Gulf of Mexico. Another, a mixture of rain and snow carried on winds from the Pacific, moved across Texas. The third, a band of light snow and gusty winds, dropped swiftly down across the country's midsection from the Arctic Circle. "Any two would produce a significant storm," Knight said. "But all three together produced a historic storm."

The three disturbances converged over the Southeast, turning up, as Knight put it, "three cherries on the slot machine."

The resulting storm is larger than the blizzard that paralyzed New York City for two days in March 1888, said Knight. The blizzard 105 years ago affected a stretch from Virginia to central and western New England. This storm has roared across an area roughly twice as large.

The storm is part of a continental weather "regime" that began in early February, Knight said. It looked a few days ago as if this pattern had ended, but the February weather system was merely interrupted briefly.

In this persisting pattern, the general path of the jet stream - the high-altitude river of air that bears storms across the country from west to east - has run from northwestern Canada southeastward along the eastern slope of the Canadian Rockies, down through Minnesota to the Tennessee Valley and up along the Eastern Seaboard. It was this jet that picked up the merged disturbances and bore the resulting superstorm northward.

Is the storm related in any way to broader climatic changes? The late 1980s saw the warmest average global temperatures on record.

But a global haze cast into the atmosphere by the June 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines reflected enough sunlight to reverse the warming trend.

While "you can't blame any specific weather event on a relatively small global forcing, what you can say is that the probability of such events may be influenced by global climate change," said Dr. James E. Hansen, a climatologist at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City.



by Archana Subramaniam by CNB