Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: MONDAY, April 26, 1993 TAG: 9304260375 SECTION: EDITORIAL PAGE: A4 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: DATELINE: LENGTH: Medium
I agree with the study's observation that Virginia needs a long-term and comprehensive economic-development policy. But I also wholeheartedly agree with the response by Virginia's secretary of economic development, Cathleen Magennis. She noted that we have to be careful not to offer open-ended incentives "with no firm idea of what it's going to cost . . . in the long run."
Magennis is also right when she identifies investment in infrastructure and education as the real keys to long-term economic-development success. Increasingly, we are moving away from reliance on manufacturing toward a service-based economy. It will take investment in roads, telecommunications, social services and education for our Virginia work force to be competitive and gain access to new, attractive jobs.
Certainly, appropriate and timely incentives are important: If a company is going to locate or relocate somewhere, then by all means we must be able and willing to make a sensible and appropriate offer. But sound development demands more than trying to outdo some other community to attract a business - especially because we, as a country, end up paying when one town, region or state wins only at the expense of another. The key to a long-run, strategic approach is investment in an area's resources: human, natural, capital and otherwise. To borrow President Clinton's phrase, we need to invest our money in ways that "grow our economy" and don't simply move around the pieces of the same pie. WAYNE D. PURCELL Coordinator, Rural Economic Analysis Program College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Virginia Tech BLACKSBURG
by CNB