The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1996, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Sunday, May 19, 1996                   TAG: 9605190054
SECTION: FRONT                    PAGE: A1   EDITION: FINAL 
SOURCE: BY DAVID M. POOLE, STAFF WRITER 
DATELINE: NEW KENT                           LENGTH: Long  :  163 lines

DEVELOPER MUST GAMBLE ON TRACK BEFORE DEADLINE OVERTAKES PROJECT<

A blink of the eye is all it takes to miss the short stretch of white fencing and ``Colonial Downs'' sign nestled in a clearing, just off Interstate 64 between Richmond and Williamsburg.

The fence and sign are the only visible indications of progress since Colonial Downs won the state's first license to operate a horse racing track two years ago.

Whether the New Kent roadside remains a piney forest or is transformed into a glimmering gambling oasis will be determined in the next 14 months.

The developers of Colonial Downs say they are confident that thoroughbreds will be thundering around a $40 million track and grandstand by June 1997.

``Colonial Downs will bring world-class racing to the commonwealth of Virginia,'' says Arnold Stansley, an Ohio harness track operator who heads Colonial Downs.

But the track is no sure bet.

Stansley is preparing to sell bonds to finance Colonial Downs at a time when the pari-mutuel industry is in a funk. Competition from state-run lotteries, casinos and other forms of gambling have stagnated betting revenues. Several recent start-up tracks in other states have been forced into bankruptcy.

Stansley also has yet to consummate a deal with Maryland tracks to create a two-state racing circuit, one of his chief selling points to the Virginia Racing Commission. Colonial Downs has yet to reach an agreement with horsemen's groups on purse accounts, which will determine the quality of racing at Colonial Downs.

Racing commission members have grown increasingly frustrated with delays, which Stansley has blamed on legal appeals by a competitor who wanted to build a track in Northern Virginia. Stansley had said the lawsuit made it impossible to sell bonds and move forward.

With the resolution of the lawsuit earlier this month, the clock has begun ticking on a commission-imposed deadline for Stansley to open Colonial Downs by July 18, 1997.

``He has run out of excuses. He either has to perform or get out of the state of Virginia,'' said Virginia Beach Sen. Kenneth Stolle, a vocal critic of Colonial Downs.

Colonial Downs is betting that it can buck industry trends and gambling competition that have forced new tracks in Texas, Alabama and Minnesota to scale back or shut down altogether.

``There's a market in Virginia - it's horse country. Done right, it can be a success,'' said Brett Stansley, Arnold's son, who oversees the Virginia project.

Colonial Downs is hoping to avoid the overly optimistic revenue projections and lavish clubhouses that have haunted most tracks that opened in the past decade.

The Colonial Downs track was designed to begin on a modest scale, with room for future expansion. The $40 million facility will cost about half as much as ill-fated tracks in Houston and Birmingham, Ala.

``It's tough to crack the nut with an $80 million facility,'' Brett Stansley said.

Colonial Downs is patterned after Trinity Meadows Raceway near Fort Worth, Texas, one of the few successful horse tracks built in the past 10 years. Arnold Stansley holds a 9 percent stake in Trinity Meadows. His principal business is a harness track in Ohio.

Trinity Meadows has pinned its success on increasing revenues by giving bettors a year-round chance to wager on races simulcast from venues around the nation.

Video wagering accounted for 80 percent of the $117 million in wagering at Trinity Meadows last year. The track's 139-day meet of live racing with thoroughbreds, quarter horses and other breeds generated the remaining 20 percent, according to the Texas Racing Commission.

The Virginia track is expected to generate three-quarters of its wagering income from simulcast races. In February, Colonial Downs opened an off-track betting parlor in Chesapeake, the first of six facilities planned around the state. A second OTB facility is planned for Richmond.

Colonial Downs may look as far west as Roanoke for other OTB sites, Brett Stansley said.

Stolle said he understands that the economics of modern horse racing make simulcasting essential to the operation of a track.

But the Republican lawmaker said he suspects that Colonial Downs will try to cut corners on the track or limit the number of live racing days in order to maximize OTB profits.

``That is what he has done in other states,'' Stolle said. ``He runs a third-rate track and makes money in other areas.

``In essence, we're going to have a race track in Virginia so Arnold Stansley can make money from satellite facilities.''

In its application, Colonial Downs projected 102 days of thoroughbred racing and 50 days of harness racing between June and October.

Arnold Stansley has left open the possibility of cutting short the maiden season.

Earlier this year, the General Assembly passed a Stolle-sponsored bill that requires Colonial Downs to invest OTB profits in the New Kent track. Colonial Downs also cannot open any more satellite facilities until Stansley reaches an agreement to set aside a percentage of bets for prizes to attract quality horses.

Thoroughbred owners and trainers want a guarantee of $150,000 in purses per day, or about 5.25 percent of total money bet. Colonial Downs is offering about 2.7 percent.

Brett Stansley said he hoped to reach an accord with horsemen's groups soon, so Colonial Downs could open more OTBs and begin building purse accounts.

``Like it or not, we and the horsemen are partners; we're in the same bed,'' he said.

Even if Colonial Downs opens all six OTB facilities, simulcast revenues may not be enough to ensure the world-class horse racing that Arnold Stansley has promised for New Kent County.

Some track owners have begun looking for other forms of revenue, such as slot machines, to draw patrons and build purse accounts.

There is the possibility that one day even Kentucky's Churchill Downs - the temple of American horse racing - may one day resemble a casino.

``There's a growing belief at many race tracks - and Churchill Downs is one of them - that simply changing the way you market your product is not enough to compete with casinos,'' said Alex Waldrop, senior vice president at Churchill Downs.

Delaware tracks have installed slot machines, a move that raised purse accounts to levels that can attract higher quality horses. Maryland tracks appear headed in the same direction.

There is a possibility that Colonial Downs, even with daily purse accounts at $150,000, would not be able to draw the best horses in the region.

Colonial Downs said a proposed Maryland-Virginia circuit would reduce direct competition. Under a tentative agreement with Maryland Jockey Club president Joe DeFrancis, Maryland would close tracks at Laurel Park and Pimlico during the Colonial Down season.

But thoroughbred owners say there is no guarantee that horses running in Maryland would come to Virginia if prizes were higher in Delaware or elsewhere.

Brett Stansley said that Colonial Downs has no plan to ask the General Assembly for permission to install casino-type games in order to remain competitive.

``I don't think Virginia is really keen on that idea,'' Brett Stansley said.

Proposals for floating casinos in Richmond and Hampton Roads have gone nowhere in the legislature in recent years.

But Stansley would not rule out a casino request in the future. ``The only thing you can count on in life is change - so I'll never say never.''

Colonial Downs alluded to slot machines in a document related to an April 12 agreement to sell a 50 percent share in the operation to casino operator Jeffrey P. Jacobs of Cleveland.

The document stated that Stansley and Jacobs would negotiate the sharing of revenue from ``any additional form of gaming'' approved by the General Assembly.

Ernest M. Oare, a member of the Virginia Racing Commission from Warrenton, said he would not support slot machines at Colonial Downs.

But he said the casino issue underscores the challenge Colonial Downs faces in getting its track up and running.

``In racing's heyday, it was the only show in town,'' Oare said. ``Now there's so much competition for that gaming dollar that wasn't there, even 10 years ago.'' MEMO: Information from The Associated Press was included in this report.

ILLUSTRATION: Color photo

HUY NGUYEN/The Virginian-Pilot

The developers of Colonial Downs say thoroughbreds will be

thundering around a $40 million track in New Kent County by June

1997, but the pari-mutuel industry is in a slump and key deals are

unsigned.

Map

VP

KEYWORDS: RACE TRACKS HORSE RACING by CNB