The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1996, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Thursday, October 10, 1996            TAG: 9610100349
SECTION: LOCAL                   PAGE: B5   EDITION: FINAL 
SOURCE: BY BILL BASKERVILL, ASSOCIATED PRESS 
DATELINE: RICHMOND                          LENGTH:   50 lines

FRAUD HOT LINE COSTING MORE THAN VIRGINIA IS RECOVERING MOST SUBSTANTIATED COMPLAINTS DID NOT RESULT IN ANY REPAYMENT TO STATE.

The cost of operating the State Employee Fraud Hotline for the past three years exceeded the amount of money the state recovered from rooting out fraud, the state auditor of public accounts said Wednesday.

Most of the complaints that were substantiated did not result in any repayment to the state, according to a report by Walter J. Kucharski.

The hot line identified fraud, waste and abuse totaling $1.18 million from July 1, 1993, to June 30, 1996. But the documented costs of pursuing hot line tips were at least $1.3 million.

What can't be measured are the hours many state officials and investigators put in checking fraud complaints, Kucharski wrote.

Gov. George Allen had not seen the report, but spokesman Greg Crist said the hot line has been a valuable tool in uncovering fraud and waste.

``I think it's also important to note that the hot line also has a certain deterrent value that is not quantified,'' Crist said.

The $1.18 million represented 234 cases, Kucharski's report said. Many of the cases, however, involved misspent funds that the state cannot recover.

In one such case, a state agency violated procurement procedures in buying office furniture, adding $56,215 to the cost. By the time the hot line received the complaint, the furniture had been paid for and received, and the person who made the purchase had left state government. The department did not return the furniture and no money was recovered.

Based on hot line complaints, 3,560 investigations were completed in three years; 2,278 were unsubstantiated and resulted in no savings.

All hot line calls go to the state internal auditor, who refers them to the appropriate agency heads to determine their validity. The internal auditor is an arm of the executive branch.

Kucharski, who is appointed by the General Assembly, said in an interview that his agency has received an increasing number of complaints from state departments and institutions about the time and expense required to review hot line tips.

The hot line ``is a valuable internal control for the Commonwealth,'' but the process for screening calls needs to be less expensive and time-consuming, Kucharski's report said.

Twenty other states operate fraud hot lines and most have procedures to screen calls and determine which have no substance, the report said.

Clogging the hot line are calls from individuals complaining about local governments and officials.

State internal auditor John J. Huston said he will put a call-screening program in effect immediately. by CNB