VPIEJ-L 5/95
VPIEJ-L Discussion Archives
May 1995
========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:28:08 EDT Reply-To: weibel@oclc.org Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: weibel@oclc.org Subject: Accreditation of Knowledge in the Electronic World > The underlying transformation is from the dependence of on jounals > that have high reputations to the dependence upon authors that have > high reputations. The challenge is how to accredit knowledge in an > environment where posterior review (review after publication) is the > dominant mode of evaluation. This is already accepted as the best way > to evaluate authors (i. e., citation counts). This is an interesting dimension of the scholarly publication process, and one that may in fact be undergoing a major change. I am personally skeptical that the role of the publisher will be so easily displaced. Its easy enough to imagine how established authors will sustain their credibility (and enhance it) in a world of only electronic imprints... it is less obvious how young investigators acquire their reputation. Do we really think that network publishing will promote a true meritocracy, where the strength of one's ideas will be clearer (without the meddling of reviewers who have agendae and biases of their own)? This may be the case, but it is not clear to me that it is so. {Aside: I do not accept that citation counts are the best way to accredit scholarly achievement. It is simply the only easy way, requiring no actual intellectual investment. heh... computers can do it, and we know how smart THEY are ;-) } Finally, before you throw out the conventional publication process, consider for a moment how the record of scholarship is archived and maintained. Will the preprint archives persist? Will they be organized, accessible, secure? These questions must be answered for electronic documents of all types, whether published formally or informally. The solutions are neither easy nor clear. stu Stuart Weibel Senior Research Scientist OCLC Office of Research weibel@oclc.org (614) 764-6081 (v) (614) 764-2344 (f) http://www.oclc.org:5046/~weibel ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:29:03 EDT Reply-To: RCOLLINS@carins.cariboo.bc.ca Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: RCOLLINS@carins.cariboo.bc.ca Subject: Re: the 70% solution? In-Reply-To: <01050105.sbgmlu@arch.ping.dk> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Collins Dept. of Accounting - FAA 13 Phone:- (604)-371-5560 University College of the Cariboo P.O.Box 3010 Fax:- (604)-371-5675 Kamloops British Columbia V2C 5N3 E-mail:- RCOLLINS@CARIBOO.BC.CA CANADA. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 28 Apr 1995, David Stodolsky wrote: > > The underlying transformation is from the dependence of on jounals > that have high reputations to the dependence upon authors that have > high reputations. The challenge is how to accredit knowledge in an > environment where posterior review (review after publication) is the > dominant mode of evaluation. This is already accepted as the best way > to evaluate authors (i. e., citation counts). > > dss > Hold on a minute...- accepted by whom ? I think you'll find that acceptance of citation counts varies widely between disciplines and institutions. Also, citation counts aren't problem-free; for example, its quite possible that authors having a very high reputation for past work might benefit from a "fan-mail" effect whereby they receive citations for indifferent current work from less-than-critical acolytes. It may also be possible for "citation cartels" to form (remember the apocrypha about the churchman and the sailor who promised one another that whenever they heard each other's name mentioned, they would point out how praiseworthy the individual was ? - And how one became a bishop, and the other, an admiral ?). Time is also a problem - in essence, the scope for citation exists for the whole of remaining time..... it might be useful to know what limits academics apply here - not to mention the scope for retrospective revisions (anyone for granting an honorary D.Litt to a certain William Shakespeare ?). On a lighter note, citations are neuter; I realise that Pons and Fleishmann have given this strategy a bad name, but a less ambitious academic could make quite a reasonable career of writing articles which others could quote .... does anyone know of a dean who makes a habit of reading all his/her Faculty's citations in the original - ie, the papers where the citations were made ? - I acknowledge the deficiencies of the "publish - anything - anywhere - or perish" system. Just so long as we are also clear that citations are, of themselves, no researchers' Valhalla.... Roger. ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:29:32 EDT Reply-To: RCOLLINS@carins.cariboo.bc.ca Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: RCOLLINS@carins.cariboo.bc.ca Subject: Re: the 70% solution? In-Reply-To: <9504241426.AA03116@alfred.econ.lsa.umich.edu> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Collins Dept. of Accounting - FAA 13 Phone:- (604)-371-5560 University College of the Cariboo P.O.Box 3010 Fax:- (604)-371-5675 Kamloops British Columbia V2C 5N3 E-mail:- RCOLLINS@CARIBOO.BC.CA CANADA. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hal, a couple of comments re your message. First, Noll & Steinmueller have an article entitled "An Economic Analysis of Journal Prices" in the Spring and Summer 1992 issue of Serials Review - pages 32-37. They concentrate on analysing subscription prices against paid circulation levels (no attempt to account for split circulations - ie individual vs institutional - as far as I can see) - and, apart from a paragraph on page 34, don't pay much attention to the prestige issue. N&S are trying to develop an economic model of the scholarly journals market. One of the problems I have with the article is that that graphs they use to make their points are capable of more than one interpretation. Anyway, take a look and see what you think... Secondly, I remember that the Accounting Review published an article re journal rankings "recently" where the average price was around $120 U.S.. However, the journal ranked around 8th out of 100 in the lineup - Accounting, Organisations and Society - was priced at around $650 U.S. Guess who publishes A.O.S. ? A free byte to whoever responds with "Elsevier" - under their Pergamon (ex Robert Maxwell) cloak... On a more general note, I for one am getting seriously concerned at the way in which the prices of those academic journals published by commercial presses are diverging from the average and at the way in which certain presses appear to be determined to exact a maximum from their monopoly of prestige. The consequences of rising journal prices for my own institution are serious; we are looking at a budget for the coming year which will involve substantial reductions in the number of journals to which we subscribe. After four years of subsidy from other resource areas the Library has decided to pull the plug; I can hardly blame them. I'm not sure whether the root causes of this are changes in exchange rates (I doubt it - UK journals not published by commercial presses continue to be reasonable buys) - or other factors; what I have noticed is how often the names Elsevier, Kluwer and Spinger-Verlag crop up whenever this topic is mentioned. Academics, in my experience, tend to be indifferent to the price of journals (particularly those purchased by their own departments). Perhaps it is time to change this.... Roger (Member, U.C.C. Library Advisory Committee). On Tue, 25 Apr 1995, Hal Varian wrote: > I agree with Andrew Ordlyzko's statement that "The game for authors > has always been to get their papers into the most prestigious > journals possible....Price was not a critical issue, since it > affected libraries, not the authors." However, I am curious about the > relationship between journal price and prestige. In my field > (economics) the most prestigous and widely cited journals are the > cheapest, since they are the ones published by the nonprofit > professional organizations and university presses. The special > interest journals are typically published by commercial presses. > Many of these are "prestigous" but they don't carry the same weight as > the top journals. > > Is this pattern similar to those found in other fields? > Has anybody looked at the relationship between price, prestige, publisher > and circulation? I've could put someone to work on this this summer if it > hasn't already been done. > > --- > Hal.Varian@umich.edu Hal Varian > voice: 313-764-2364 Dept of Economics > fax: 313-764-2364 Univ of Michigan > http://gopher.econ.lsa.umich.edu Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220 > ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:30:22 EDT Reply-To: amo@research.att.com Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Andrew Odlyzko <amo@research.att.com> Subject: economics of scholarly publishing X-cc: Hal.Varian@umich.edu, ginsparg@qfwfq.lanl.gov, harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk A repeated question that has been raised in this forum is whether authors can be persuaded to behave so as to reduce costs of journals, say by steering their works to inexpensive publications. Unfortunately there is little evidence that this will happen. Altruism is not a powerful motive, and there are few ways to make it more attractive. The perverse economic incentives that operate in scholarly publishing are illustrated well by the following bit of history, extracted from an email message from Paul Ginsparg (ginsparg@qfwfq.lanl.gov), the creator of the preprint server that has revolutionized information dissemination in many subfields of physics and other disciplines. ******* quoted from a message from Paul Ginsparg ********** i need to provide a small amount of background. in the late 70's, the elsevier journal nuclear physics b took over [from Physical Review D] as the "journal of choice" in this field [nuclear physics] by abolishing page charges (no matter that their subscription charges to libraries were many times larger than the aps journals [such as Physical Review D], that was an indirect cost that researchers never saw). all the larger more active groups (harvard, princeton, ...) decided across the board they would not pay any page charges (under the guise of fairness: since there wasn't enough on the grant to cover a large group of students, postdocs, jnr and senior faculty), which moved all of those contributions to nucl phys b. the belated response from phys rev d in the mid '80s was to eliminate page charges as well, but just for phys rev d, and by the early 90's patriotic americans began resubmitting to the aps journal. but now, times are evidently getting tighter -- library subscriptions are not increasing, and the aps comes right out and explains that its publishing activities are used to subsidize its other activities (lobbying efforts, educational outreach, ...). so more or less in defiance of its editors, the financial wing decides to reinstitute page charges and increase them across the board ... ********* end of quote ********* Note that the physicists in this story behaved in a perfectly rational way. The money they saved by not paying page charges was money they could use for support of graduate students, etc. They did not have to use their grants to pay for the increase in library costs associated with the shift from an inexpensive journal to a much pricier one. Furthermore, even if they had to pay for that cost, they would have come out ahead; the inrease in the costs of just their own library associated with an individual decision to publish in Nuclear Physics B instead of the less expensive Physical Review D (could such a small change been quantified) would have been much smaller than the savings on page charges. Most of the extra cost would have been absorbed by other institutions. To make this argument more explicit, consider two journals, H (high priced) and L (low priced). Suppose that each one has 1,000 library subscriptions and no individual ones. L is a very lean operation, and it costs them $3,000 to publish each article. They collect $1,000 of that $3,000 from authors through page charges, and the other $2,000 from subscribers, so that each library in effect pays $2 for each article that appears in L. On the other hand, H collects $7,000 in revenue per article, all from subscriptions, which comes to $7 per article for each library. (It does not matter much whether the extra cost of H is due to profits, higher quality, or inefficiency.) From the standpoint of society as a whole, or of any individual library, it would be desirable to steer all authors towards publishing in L, as that would save a total of $4,000. However, look at this situation from the standpoint of the author. If she publishes in L, she loses $1,000 that could be spent on graduate students, conferences, etc. If she publishes in H, she gets to keep that money. She does not get charged for the extra cost to any library, at least not right away. Eventually the overhead rates on her contract might go up to pay for the higher library spending at her institution. However, this effect is delayed, and is very weak. Even if we had accounting mechanisms that would provide instantaneous feedback (which we manifestly do not, with journal prices set over a year in advance and totally insensitive to minor changes caused by individual authors deciding where to publish), our hyppothetical author would surely only get charged for the extra $5 that she causes her library to spend ($7 for publication in H as opposed to $2 in L), and not for the costs to all the other 999 libraries. She would still save $995 ($1000 - $5) of her grant money. Is it any wonder if she chooses to publish in H? Andrew Odlyzko AT&T bell Laboratories ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:31:02 EDT Reply-To: Guedon Jean-Claude <guedon@ere.umontreal.ca> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Guedon Jean-Claude <guedon@ere.umontreal.ca> Subject: Re: the 70% solution To Andrew Odlyzko and Hal Varian, and others, In view of the question very well put by Hal (However, I am curious about the relationship between journal price and prestige) and even more the following: Has anybody looked at the relationship between price, prestige, publisher and circulation? I wonder whether we could not organize some co-ordinated effort to bring out these statistics. In other words, could we not approach various grant agencies in the States, in Canada (I could take care of that) and elsewhere (I have some good contacts in France, for example) to really draw a comprehensive picture of what is going on in the field of scholarly periodicals. For example, getting some good benchmarks on page production costs (with or without illustrations, etc.), along with the correlations sought by Hal, could really help design policies for library purchases on the one hand and for the development of electronic serials on the other hand. Any reaction to this proposal. This is a *concrete* research project that I am talking about, and one that should be conducted on an international scale. Best, Jean-Claude Guedon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jean-Claude Guedon Tel. 514-343-6208 Professeur titulaire Fax: 514-343-2211 Departement de litterature comparee Surfaces Universite de Montreal Tel. 514-343-5683 C.P. 6128, Succursale "A" Fax. 514-343-5684 Montreal, Qc H3C 3J7 ftp ftp.umontreal.ca Canada guedon@ere.umontreal.ca ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:31:25 EDT Reply-To: ball@tsclion.Trenton.EDU Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: "William J. Ball" <ball@beast.trenton.edu> Organization: Trenton State College Subject: looking for HTML sytle sheets for scholarly articles I am beginning work on a project to publish political science research on the web. I have browsed a variety of the on-line journals and compared document formats like html (2 and 3), acrobat, etc. I would like to establish contact with people or organizations active in defining html style appropriate for publishing scholarly research. I would appreciate any leads in this regard. I have been experimenting a bit on my own--ideas can be found on my home page at URL http://web1.trenton.edu/~ball ----- Bill Ball, Trenton State College, ball@trenton.edu ----- ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:36:23 EDT Reply-To: Sharp Review <review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Sharp Review <review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> Subject: Katharine Sharp Review - Final Call Call For Papers (Final Call) The Katharine Sharp Review (This information can also be found at http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~review) This is the final call for submissions to The Katharine Sharp Review, the peer-reviewed e-journal devoted to student scholarship and research within the interdisciplinary scope of library and information science. The deadline for all submissions is May 15. The Katharine Sharp Review exists as a journal to present articles by student authors who are concerned with topics relevant to library and information science and can consist of work that has been both prepared for coursework and through independent study. Recognizing the breadth that library and information science encompasses, submissions may cover a wide variety of topics in the field, and be represented in many forms: research findings and their application, analysis of policies and practices within the industry, thematic textual review, to name but a few. Preparation of Manuscripts I. All manuscripts must be received in machine readable form. This can be in one of two ways: As an ASCII text file submitted via e-mail to: sharp-review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu OR Contained on a 3.5" computer disk, formatted for IBM or compatible. We can accept disks produced with a number of various word processing packages and any files that have been converted to ASCII format. Please provide the name and version of the word processing package used. Disks can be mailed to: Kevin Ward, The Katharine Sharp Review Publications Office Graduate School of Library and Information Science 501 E. Daniel Street Champaign, IL 61820-6211 II. Figures, diagrams, and other graphical forms must also be provided in electronic format. This can be in any of the standard graphic formats (.gif, .jpg, etc.). If you have any questions regarding this requirement, please e-mail the Review. Editorial Guidelines for Authors III. Use a recognized standard form and style, preferably according to the Chicago Style Manual (14th Edition). IV. If submitting in ASCII format, please use underscoring to indicate italics and asterix to indicate bold face. This will allow for more accurate formatting upon receipt. V. Footnotes should be kept to a minimum, if at all. VI. If citing from a journal that is found in electronic format, please include its site address (i.e. ftp, gopher, etc.) VII. Copyright: The Katharine Sharp Review will not hold copyright permissions for any published article but does reserve the right to grant reprint permissions to non-profit organizations. The submission of any article to the Review is done so in agreement with this provision. Correspondence All submissions and correspondence regarding The Katharine Sharp Review should be directed to the editor, Kevin Ward. Receipt of all articles will be acknowledged and authors contacted upon acceptance of their contribution. Any questions or comments? Please direct them to The Katharine Sharp Review (sharp-review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu). For more information regarding the review, please visit our homepage at: http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~review + + Kevin Ward Editor The Katharine Sharp Review sharp-review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~review + + ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 09:05:23 EDT Reply-To: Gregory Kealey <gkealey@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Gregory Kealey <gkealey@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> Subject: Re: the 70% solution In-Reply-To: <9504301447.AA13091@tornade.ERE.UMontreal.CA> While I can't speak for the group I am certain that the Canadian Association of Learned Journals would be very interested in working on such a project. greg kealey On Mon, 1 May 1995, Guedon Jean-Claude wrote: > To Andrew Odlyzko and Hal Varian, and others, > > In view of the question very well put by Hal (However, I am curious about the > relationship between journal price and prestige) > > and even more the following: > > Has anybody looked at the relationship between price, prestige, publisher > and circulation? > > I wonder whether we could not organize some co-ordinated effort to > bring out these statistics. In other words, could we not approach various > grant agencies in the States, in Canada (I could take care of that) and > elsewhere (I have some good contacts in France, for example) to really > draw a comprehensive picture of what is going on in the field of > scholarly periodicals. > > For example, getting some good benchmarks on page production costs (with > or without illustrations, etc.), along with the correlations sought by > Hal, could really help design policies for library purchases on the one > hand and for the development of electronic serials on the other hand. > > Any reaction to this proposal. This is a *concrete* research project > that I am talking about, and one that should be conducted on an international > scale. > > Best, > > Jean-Claude Guedon > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jean-Claude Guedon Tel. 514-343-6208 > Professeur titulaire Fax: 514-343-2211 > Departement de litterature comparee Surfaces > Universite de Montreal Tel. 514-343-5683 > C.P. 6128, Succursale "A" Fax. 514-343-5684 > Montreal, Qc H3C 3J7 ftp ftp.umontreal.ca > Canada guedon@ere.umontreal.ca > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 09:05:46 EDT Reply-To: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Subject: Existing Studies For anyone who wants to get "serious" about a research project in the area of journals prices, values, etc., we at ARL have a pretty comprehensive bibliography of such studies as have been done over the last 10 years or so. I'd be glad to share it and discuss some of the work therein of which we have firsthand knowledge. These studies have been conducted in specific discipline areas and none of them have dug as deep as Hal and Jean Claude propose. For the most part, they stop short of prestige assessments, though a few have factored in citation data from ISI. Four of the studies, an ARL study of 1988-89, a Utah Study and the Noll/Steinmuller studies of the early 90s, and Chressanthis' recent work, have involved economists, but mostly did not attempt to assess prestige. The largest data sets have included no more than 200-400 journal titles (more or less). Most studies have assessed a smaller set of titles. Way back in 1990/91, ARL tried to assemble funding to create a sizeable and comprehensive dataset in order to learn some of the kinds of things that have been proposed here recently. Approaching foundations about their interest in funding a research project yielded little. (The work of gathering good data on individual journal titles was, as we learned from the 150 titles or so we worked on, finnicky and labor-intensive. Without solid data sets, it is impossible to learn much of anything.) What we heard at the time was that everyone knew enough about the costs of journals (or as much as we need to know) and that examining the costs of the current paper system was passe since the new, cutting edge of interest was in electronic dissemination. My bet is that any study, in order to be successful in attracting funds and answering much needed questions, will attempt to develop data that give us all a leg up on the economics, prestige, etc., of *electronic* publication as well. Given our long-term interest in this area, we would be happy to work with anyone who is interested in defining a real study and identifying funding for it. At the least, I'd be glad to discuss what information we do have and some of the tricky areas of such studies, with those who want to mount a project. Ann Okerson/Association of Research Libraries ann@cni.org ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 09:59:02 EDT Reply-To: Christine Irizarry <ci20@columbia.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Christine Irizarry <ci20@columbia.edu> Subject: Re: the 70% solution plus a grain of salt In-Reply-To: <9504301447.AA13091@tornade.ERE.UMontreal.CA> A grain of salt from a Manhattannite: Don't underestimate the power of Elsevier-Pergamon-Kluwer-Springer. While you muse about the print business, some serious lobbying is going on to enforce copyrights aggressively and not freely... I heard indirectly that, online, there'll be something like an on-and-off switch to make sure everyone pays per view, so to speak, or to put it in French, une esp`ece de robinet des droits d'auteurs... Good luck with your study! Everyone even slightly familiar with scientific publishing knows what the picture is, who owns the rights, who calls the shots. Will it change? Inch Allah... We can be glad that we don't get charged for reading a book or any printed matter more than once; the logic being: shouldn't someone who reads an article more than once, or quotes from it, be charged more than someone who just browses its contents? After all you're just buying the paper and the glue, but not the prized intellectual property. In France, in fact, the whole idea of using a library, any library, free of charge is seriously being put in question. We in New York are a bit luckier. There are books littering the streets... Who pays for the free rides? Are they free? / Christine On Mon, 1 May 1995, Guedon Jean-Claude wrote: > To Andrew Odlyzko and Hal Varian, and others, > > In view of the question very well put by Hal (However, I am curious about the > relationship between journal price and prestige) > > and even more the following: > > Has anybody looked at the relationship between price, prestige, publisher > and circulation? > > I wonder whether we could not organize some co-ordinated effort to > bring out these statistics. In other words, could we not approach various > grant agencies in the States, in Canada (I could take care of that) and > elsewhere (I have some good contacts in France, for example) to really > draw a comprehensive picture of what is going on in the field of > scholarly periodicals. > > For example, getting some good benchmarks on page production costs (with > or without illustrations, etc.), along with the correlations sought by > Hal, could really help design policies for library purchases on the one > hand and for the development of electronic serials on the other hand. > > Any reaction to this proposal. This is a *concrete* research project > that I am talking about, and one that should be conducted on an international > scale. > > Best, > > Jean-Claude Guedon > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jean-Claude Guedon Tel. 514-343-6208 > Professeur titulaire Fax: 514-343-2211 > Departement de litterature comparee Surfaces > Universite de Montreal Tel. 514-343-5683 > C.P. 6128, Succursale "A" Fax. 514-343-5684 > Montreal, Qc H3C 3J7 ftp ftp.umontreal.ca > Canada guedon@ere.umontreal.ca > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 09:59:20 EDT Reply-To: Richard Meyer <richard_meyer.library#u#macs@office.library.trinity.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Richard Meyer <richard_meyer.library#u#macs@office.library.trinity.edu> Subject: Re- the 70% solution Subject: Time:10:57 AM OFFICE MEMO Re: the 70% solution Date:5/2/95 Warning: the following is about a dozen paragraphs, which makes it longer than many of the contributions to this forum. Much of the discussion here has focused on costs of production and speed of communication as driving forces that will determine whether or not publications will emerge in the electronic domain. This offers a broader set of considerations than simply production costs or communications. Scholars demand (as in the economic sense of acquiring) two things: 1) documentation of the latest and most accurate knowledge and/or information on scholarly subjects; and 2) outlets for their contributions to this pool of scholarship. Scholars pay a limited set of costs for number 1): searching costs (labor) when information is being sought; printing (usually photocopy) and borrowing costs (labor or interlibrary loan charges) for individual articles; and, indirect overhead on their grant proposals which subsidizes the library. Scholars pay the following costs for number 2): page charges (sometimes); creative and editorial effort (labor); and usually, they relinquish copyright in trade for acceptance of their scholarly expressions. Scholars receive value in four areas for their contributions which accrue to one or both of their demands as noted by the number in parentheses: Communication -- every individual's contribution to knowledge, information and data is conveyed to others; thus impacting the reputation of the author (2) and educating the reader (1). Archiving -- historically relevant scholarship is preserved and fixed in time (1). Filtering -- contributions in given disciplines are separated into levels of quality, which improves search costs allocation (1) and establishes or enhances reputation (2). Segmenting -- all scholarship is separated into discipline groupings, which is important to reduce search costs to scholars (1). These are values that publishers provide by sorting submissions on quality margins as well as by discipline. To establish the brand names and infrastructure in the electronic domain to provide this value adding process can be accomplished, but costs related to each of the values described above need to be accomodated and may depend on the transformation process utilized. To this point, many have assumed the emergence of an all electronic replacement of older print publications by competing and completely new electronic alternatives. This seems to be predicated on the narrow assumption that the only value received from publisher efforts has been in the area of communication. That is to say, the higher communication speed of electronics presumably will drive this transformation predicted by Odlyzko and others. However, given the larger framework described here, it appears possible that a transformation could be achieved at lower cost by moving existing print journals to the electronic sphere rather than creating a whole new set. The infrastructure and complex inter-relationships currently existing in the print domain of scholarship evolved over a long time. In order for a parallel structure to evolve in the electronic domain, electronic publishers have to be able to add as much value to the process of scholarship as print publishers. As noted, value must be added in archiving, filtering and segmenting as well as communication. Electronic publishers starting with a new journal must establish a brand name that readily communicates the level of quality associated with their product. Traditionally, this brand name has rested on the reputation of editors and has been nurtured by years of consistent performance. On the surface it may appear that the 200 plus electronic titles identified by the Association of Research Libraries represent successful efforts along the lines described, but examination of actual numbers indicates otherwise. For example, if you look at PACS Review ( a librarians' publication from the University of Houston on electronic catalogs) the growth in new submissions per year is flat at best and more likely declining. Over the four year period 1990 to 1993, the number of articles in PACS Review declined from 16 to 8. The number of pages from 241 to 194 and the number of new authors declined as well. The same seems to be true for many of the electronic upstarts. However at the same time, traditional print journals are being packaged in groups and successfully marketed to libraries in electronic form. For example, the Adonis collection contains over 600 print journals on CD-ROM going back about 5 years. It costs $20,000 for a single workstation subscription. Coincidently, Trinity University subscribes to the print version of 26 titles covered by this product. Cost to Trinity: $34,000 per year. Trinity could cancel the print, purchase Adonis and save $14,000 at little or no increase in non-dollar user cost to patrons. However, users would have to pay $7 for each article that they print. If Trinity's library subsidized user printing, it would still break even at 2,000 article prints per year. With 230 faculty and 2,400 students, it appears likely that favorable economies could accrue from switching. Of course, unmet demand and related issues would emerge to cloud the scenario, but the existence of scale economies seems temptingly real. What's more, the revenue stream to publishers could easily expand under this situation. As it turns out, Ebsco, UMI, CD-PLUS, Information Access, SilverPlatter and other companies are implementing similar products. Thus, I am tempted to say that much of the discussion in this forum is focused on incomplete data and misses the obvious. This message is in response to several that discuss the relationship of prestige to the price of certain scholarly journals. In some disciplines -- librarianship included -- less expensive society publications have better brand names (higher prestige) than more expensive commercial publications. I think commercial publishers have an interest in maximizing capture of consumer surplus and have a vehicle to do so in that every individual scholarly publication is a monopoly of sorts -- there are no absolute substitutes for any given journal. Whereas, with the scholarly society -- which also owns a monopoly for each title published-- there is no incentive to extract excess consumer surplus since the members of the society are also the consumers. So far, the electronic domain has given little evidence of being able to provide archiving, filtering and segmentation of contributions with sufficient enough associated value to persuade many scholars to transfer their efforts to that domain. At some point, technology will provide secure methods to stablize long term continuance of electronic archives. Some of the electronic publications have associated editorial boards consisting of scholars with established reputations in the discipline, thus they provide a major component needed to determine brand name. And hopefully, better organization of the resources electronically available on the Internet will emerge. The transformation from print to electronic is driven by the combination of costs and values associated with not only communications, but also archiving, filtering and segmenting. When those combine appropriately for any given discipline, the shift is likely to occur. When an electronic publication offers total value to scholars summed over all four dimensions which exceed scholar's costs and summed values in the print domain, that electronic publication will be successful. Publications already existing in print have at least two steps ahead of any new title on the highway to success. Therefore it seems reasonable to not expect a crumbling of the print empire, but a relocation of that empire or its duplication in the electronic world. Costs and values associated with filtering, segmenting and archiving must all be considered in addition to communicating to complete the model describing the transition from print to electronic. Cheers, Rich Meyer =========================================================== Richard W. Meyer, Director, Maddux Library, Trinity University 715 Stadium Drive, San Antonio, TX 78212 -7200 Telephone: (210) 736-8121 FAX: (210) 735-3342 E-mail: richard_meyer@library.trinity.edu ============================================================ ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 10:00:37 EDT Reply-To: Bruce Kingma <bk797@cnsibm.albany.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Bruce Kingma <bk797@cnsibm.albany.edu> Subject: Existing Studies > For anyone who wants to get "serious" about a research project in the > area of journals prices, values, etc., we at ARL have a pretty > comprehensive bibliography of such studies as have been done over the > last 10 years or so. I'd be glad to share it and discuss some of the > work therein of which we have firsthand knowledge. Ann, please send me the ARL list of papers. For others, the list of papers I use in my economics of information class are given below. There are several interesting papers (in addition to the Noll and Steinmueller paper) in the library science and economics literature which you may want to read on this topic. Two nice papers on the relationship between pricing and journal prestige include: "The Economics of Economics Journals: A statistical Analysis of Pricing Practices by Publishers" H. Craig Peterson, College & Research Libraries, 1992 "Publisher monopoly power and third-degree price discrimination of scholarly journals" Chressanthis and Chressanthis, Technical Services Quarterly, 1993 Both papers focus on economics journals. I think the authors of the above papers would agree that as economists their natural focus was on economics journals, while the "journal pricing problem" is more relevant to the technical, science, and medical journals. There are also several good theoretical papers of various degrees of difficulty including: "The Provision of Scholarly Journals by Libraries via Electronic Technologies: An Economic Analysis" Zahray and Sirbu, Information Economics and Policy, 1989/90 "The Economics of the Scholarly Journal" Lewis, College & Research Libraries, 1989 "Prices of Foreign and Academic Journals: A Supply and Demand Analysis" Woolsey and Strauch, Publishing Research Quarterly (?) and two excellent related papers: "Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals" Leibowitz, Journal of Political Economy, 1985 "Journal Price Escalation and the Market for Information: The Librarians' Solution" Kingma and Eppard, College & Research Libraries, 1992. Liebowitz showed a positive coefficient on journal quality (measured by citation statistics) and journal price to libraries relative to individual prices. This result was confirmed by Peterson (1992) and by Chressanthis (1993). Those that are interested in this topic may also want to attend the upcoming conference "Challenging Marketplace Solutions to the Problems in the Economics of Information" in Washington D.C., September 18-19, at which Hal Varian and Roger Noll are scheduled to speak. More information about registration for this conference will be sent to this listserve in a few weeks. (Please feel free to send a message directly to me--NOT TO THIS LIST-- for more information. I am one of the conference organizers. The sponsors include ARL, CLR, CNI, SUNY, NASULGC). ********************************************** Bruce R. Kingma, Assistant Professor School of Information Science and Policy Department of Economics State University of New York at Albany Albany, New York 12222 phone: (518) 442-5123 fax: (518) 442-5232 *********************************************** ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 10:00:56 EDT Reply-To: Bruce Barton <bhb.pressbks@press.uchicago.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Bruce Barton <bhb.pressbks@press.uchicago.edu> Subject: Re: the 70% solution While I support the idea of a systematic study of the relation between journals prices per page, compositional complexity, circulation, and prestige, I'm not certain what implications this would have the publication of electronic journals. The 70% solution is often cited by publishers to rebut the suggestion that the move from paper to ether will bring with it a dramatic reduction in production costs and, therefore, in journal and book prices. After the 30% of a publisher's total costs attributable to typesetting, printing, and binding are eliminated, an intractable 70% remain, and to this we must add the new costs of electronic delivery--equipment, technical staff, network connectivity, and the like. Publishers conclude that because their costs will not be reduced by much, consumers of epublications should not expect a significant reduction in prices. In fact, one could argue that publishers' costs could increase as the value-added features of epublications increase in sophistication or as the role of scholarly archivist shifts from libraries to publishers (if that happens, as it may well). Jim O'Donnell's intriguing suggestion is that the 70% figure may not be intractable. Here is some corroborating evidence. In book publications (the area with which I am most familiar), marketing expenses account for a sizable chunk of the publisher's so-called fixed costs. The sales force is one such marketing expense. Sales representation to bookstores, wholesalers and to a lesser extent to libraries is the principal method publishers use to bring their product, physical books, to the ultimate consumer, the readers of books. Along the way the books may have been sold several times. (They may have also been shipped several times: publishers sometimes quip that the only people who make money in publishing are trucking companies.) The cost of putting the sales force on the road is the cost of priming this distribution channel for physical books. Incidentally, because of the structure of this distribution channel, the publisher's costs do not add up to the list price value of sales. At each point of exchange in this channel, other costs are incurred and must be covered by what the ultimate consumer pays for a book. These costs often approach 50% of the list price of a book. Traditionally, they are recovered through the discounts publishers offer to intermediaries in the channel. Eliminate the distribution channel that is designed to deliver printed books and you eliminate the cost of priming it and the costs incurred in distribution by that means. Bytes, like books, are also physical objects, but do not require shelf space in hundreds of bookstores to reach their readers (so long as they do not reach them via diskette or CD ROM). To deliver bytes, buildings to house bookstores and warehouses, trucks to deliver products, and people to coordinate this process are not needed. In their place, we pull fiber-optic cable, tether it routers, and set the network to humming. This new distribution channel will have a new set of costs. But until the construction of this new infrastructure is complete and the market forces that govern it begin to play themselves out, we may not know what these costs will be. Only after we take into account this shift in the structure of distribution of publications can we guess what the pricing of epublications will be. Bruce Barton The University of Chicago Press bbarton@press.uchicago.edu Voice: 312-702-7651 Fax: 312-702-9756 ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 09:50:42 EDT Reply-To: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Subject: Bibliography For all those in VPIEJ-L land who have sent or are about to send us messages asking for the biblography I mentioned yesterday, here's a way to find 90+% of it in one easy swoop. It contains most, but not all, of the articles Bruce Kingma lists in his message. The articles and studies are all in paper; those who are interested in reading them, will need to hunt them down in a library or via ILL. Look at the ARL web site: http://arl.cni.org Open the menu item for: AAU Task Force Reports (or it may be the Association of American University Task Force reports) Open the menu item for: STI or Science and Technology Task Force Report In that document: Appendix D Appendix D comprises two parts: o Working Bibliography of the Economics of Scholarly Communicationns o Journal Pricing Studies It is up to date (as best we knew) at the time of publication, approximately a year ago. Ann Okerson/ARL ann@cni.org ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 09:50:56 EDT Reply-To: David Stodolsky <david@arch.ping.dk> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: David Stodolsky <david@arch.ping.dk> Organization: University of Copenhagen Subject: Re: the 70% solution? ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- In Regards to your letter <pine.3.89.9504281057.a539117766-0100000@carins.cariboo.bc.ca>: > On Fri, 28 Apr 1995, David Stodolsky wrote: > > > > > The underlying transformation is from the dependence of on jounals > > that have high reputations to the dependence upon authors that have > > high reputations. The challenge is how to accredit knowledge in an > > environment where posterior review (review after publication) is the > > dominant mode of evaluation. This is already accepted as the best way > > to evaluate authors (i. e., citation counts). > > > > dss > > > > Hold on a minute...- accepted by whom ? I think you'll find that > acceptance of citation counts varies widely between disciplines and > institutions. Also, citation counts aren't problem-free; for example, its > quite possible that authors having a very high reputation for past work > might benefit from a "fan-mail" effect whereby they receive citations for > indifferent current work from less-than-critical acolytes. > > It may also be possible for "citation cartels" to form (remember the apocrypha > about the churchman and the sailor who promised one another that whenever they > heard each other's name mentioned, they would point out how praiseworthy > the individual was ? - And how one became a bishop, and the other, an > admiral ?). > > Time is also a problem - in essence, the scope for citation exists for > the whole of remaining time..... it might be useful to know what limits > academics apply here - not to mention the scope for retrospective revisions > (anyone for granting an honorary D.Litt to a certain William Shakespeare ?). > > On a lighter note, citations are neuter; I realise that Pons and > Fleishmann have given this strategy a bad name, but a less ambitious > academic could make quite a reasonable career of writing articles which > others could quote .... does anyone know of a dean who makes a habit of > reading all his/her Faculty's citations in the original - ie, the papers > where the citations were made ? > > - I acknowledge the deficiencies of the "publish - anything - anywhere - > or perish" system. Just so long as we are also clear that citations are, > of themselves, no researchers' Valhalla.... Citation counts, in their present form, are only slightly better than publication counts. However, the "citation" in the electronic domain does not have to be of the same "neuter" sort which appears in paper publication. This is a function of the (logically) weak connections between articles compared to the very strong connections between sections of a paper article today. In the future, the articles will be shorter and the connections between them just a strong as the connections within them. These "links" can not only be identified as in support or opposition to a statement in the target article, but also "typed", that is, point to a "logical error", failure to recognize earlier work, etc. Finally, they will be constantly updated, as authors try to enhance their reputations, and each link can be characterized as to whether it will hold up over time. That is, the reputation of a given author will be calculable from a global evaluation of said links. This could also be the basis for knowledge accreditation, that is, identifying good articles. This is covered in some detail in: Stodolsky, D. (1984). Commonalities among conferencing systems and their implication for marketing strategy. Organisatoriske Fragmenter 1984, 12, 43-58. Stodolsky, D. (1984, December). Self-management of criticism in dialog: Dynamic regulation through automatic mediation. Paper presented at the symposium Communicating and Contracts between people in the Computerized Society, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Background paper: (1988, September). Self-management of criticism in dialogue. URL: FTP://ftp.EU.net/documents/authors/Stodolsky/selfman.crit.dialog.Z dss David S. Stodolsky, PhD, Euromath Center, University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. david@euromath.dk david@arch.ping.dk. Tel.: +45 38 33 03 30. Fax: +45 38 33 88 80. (C) ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 09:51:44 EDT Reply-To: David Stodolsky <david@arch.ping.dk> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: David Stodolsky <david@arch.ping.dk> Organization: University of Copenhagen Subject: Re: the 70% solution In Regards to your letter <199505022123.QAA06793@press-gopher.uchicago.edu>: > people to coordinate this process are not needed. In their place, we > pull fiber-optic cable, tether it routers, and set the network to > humming. This new distribution channel will have a new set of costs. > But until the construction of this new infrastructure is complete and the > market forces that govern it begin to play themselves out, we may not > know what these costs will be. Assuming you prepare documents on a word processor connected to a network, distribution is free (once capital investment has been made). There are radio stations "broadcasting" onto the Internet today. Stodolsky, D. (1991). Distribution costs already negligible. Psychological Science, 2(6), 429. dss David S. Stodolsky, PhD, Euromath Center, University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. david@euromath.dk david@arch.ping.dk. Tel.: +45 38 33 03 30. Fax: +45 38 33 88 80. (C) ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 09:53:54 EDT Reply-To: Schryburt Denis <dps@nlo.nlc-bnc.ca> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> Comments: RFC822 error:TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained. From: Schryburt Denis <dps@nlo.nlc-bnc.ca> Subject: Analytical Bibliography for Canadian Studies A Summer Course / La bibliographie analytique et les etudes canadiennes Un cours d'ete offert ANNOUNCEMENT The Institute on Canadian Bibliography is offering Analytical Bibliography for Canadian Studies A Summer Course August 21 to 25, 1995 National Library of Canada, Ottawa The Institute The Institute on Canadian Bibliography, founded by the National Library of Canada and the Bibliographical Society of Canada, provides a forum for courses, lectures and discussions on Canadian bibliography. The 1995 Course The course, offered in English with some French sessions, will be held from Monday, August 21 to Friday, August 25, 1995. This course will include lectures, demonstrations, and workshops on the techniques of bibliographical analysis. There will also be descriptions of Canadian printing of the hand- and machine-press periods. Methods of bibliographical research will be presented in the context of historical and textual applications. Standards for imprint, thematic, and author bibliographies will be discussed. Topics will include paper, typography, illustration, and binding; the use of publishers' records; and software for bibliography. There will be demonstrations and exhibitions at the National Library, the National Archives of Canada, and the National Museum of Science and Technology. Canadian bibliographers will lecture on their current work, and there will be opportunities to discuss proposals and consult on work in progress. Program director and lecturer: Patricia Fleming, Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto Coordinator: Gwynneth Evans, National Library of Canada Staff of the Institute will include: Joyce Banks, Michel Brisebois and staff of the National Library of Canada; Jim Burant, Documentary Art Acquisition and Research, National Archives of Canada; Anne Dondertman, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto; Judy Donnelly, Southam InfoLab, Hamilton; Yvan Lamonde, Department of French Language and Literature, McGill University, Montreal; Eric Swanick, New Brunswick Legislative Library, Fredericton; Bruce Whiteman, Department of Rare Books, McGill University, Montreal Who Should Attend? This course is intended for librarians, literary scholars, historians, graduate students, and others interested in the history of the book in Canada. What Will the Course Cost? The 5-day course will cost $375.00 How to Apply For further details, including information on housing, and application forms, please contact: Gwynneth Evans Director General National and International Programs National Library of Canada 395 Wellington Street Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Telephone: (613) 995-3904 Fax: (613) 947-2916 E-mail gwynneth.evans@nlc-bnc.ca Applications for the seminar will be accepted until all 25 places are filled. Applications received by June 30, 1995, will be accorded priority. The organizers reserve the right to cancel the course if there is insufficient number of applicants for the Institute to pay its expenses. ***** ANNONCE L Institut de bibliographie canadienne presente La bibliographie analytique et les etudes canadiennes Un cours d'ete offert du 21 au 25 aout 1995 par la Bibliotheque nationale du Canada, a Ottawa L'Institut Fonde par la Bibliotheque nationale du Canada et la Societe bibliographique du Canada, l Institut de bibliographie canadienne offrira une tribune pour des cours, des conferences et des discussions sur les bibliographies canadiennes. Le cours de 1995 Le cours, offert en anglais avec des sessions en francais, aura lieu du lundi 21 aout au vendredi 25 aout 1995. Ce cours presentera des conferences, des demonstrations et des ateliers sur les techniques de bibliographie analytique. On y presentera egalement des descriptions d'imprimes canadiens produits a l'epoque des presses manuelles et des presses mecaniques. Des methodes de recherche bibliographique seront exposees dans le contexte des applications historiques et textuelles. On discutera des normes pour les bibliographies consacrees aux imprimes, les bibliographies thematiques et les bibliographies d'auteur. Les themes porteront sur le papier, la typographie, l'illustration, la reliure, l'utilisation de documents de l'editeur ainsi que l'emploi des logiciels pour les bibliographies. Des demonstrations et des expositions se tiendront a la Bibliotheque nationale, aux Archives nationales du Canada et au Musee national des sciences et de la technologie. Des bibliographes canadiens vont faire etat de leurs recherches actuelles et il sera possible de discuter de projets et de consulter les travaux en cours. Directrice du programme et conferenciere : Patricia Fleming, Faculty of Information Studies, Universite de Toronto Coordinatrice: Gwynneth Evans, Bibliotheque nationale du Canada Professeurs et conferenciers: Joyce Banks, Michel Brisebois et membres du personnel de la Bibliotheque nationale du Canada; Jim Burant, Acquisition et recherche en art documentaire, Archives nationales du Canada; Anne Dondertman, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, bibliotheque de l'Universite de Toronto; Judy Donnelly, Southam InfoLab Hamilton; Yvan Lamonde, Departement de langue et litterature francaises, Universite McGill, Montreal; Eric Swanick, Bibliotheque de l'Assemblee legislative du Nouveau-Brunswick, Fredericton; Bruce Whiteman, Departement des livres rares, Universite McGill, Montreal Participants vises Ce cours s'adresse aux bibliothecaires, aux chercheurs litteraires, aux historiens, aux etudiants des 2e et 3e cycles et aux gens qui s'interessent a l'histoire du livre au Canada. Couts du cours Le cours, d une duree de 5 jours, coute 375 $. Inscription Pour obtenir des renseignements additionnels sur les frais d'inscription, l'hebergement et les formules d'inscription, veuillez communiquer avec: Gwynneth Evans Directrice generale Programmes nationaux et internationaux Bibliotheque nationale du Canada 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Telephone: (613) 995-3904 Telecopieur: (613) 947-2916 Courrier electronique: gwynneth.evans@nlc-bnc.ca Les inscriptions au seminaire seront acceptees tant qu'il restera de la place (25 places seulement). Nous donnerons priorite aux demandes recues avant le 30 juin 1995. Les organisateurs se reservent le droit d annuler le cours lorsque le nombre insuffisant de participants ne justifie pas le paiement des frais par l Institut. ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 13:09:06 EDT Reply-To: Hal.Varian@umich.edu Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Hal Varian <hal@alfred.econ.lsa.umich.edu> Subject: Re: Accreditation of Knowledge in the Electronic World I've got a little write up on how one might develop an electronic journal that uses a different kind of evaluation/filtering system that traditional refereeing. It's at http://gopher.econ.lsa.umich.edu/pages/PIE.html. At the moment this is very speculative, but I would welcome commentary by members of this list. --- Hal.Varian@umich.edu Hal Varian voice: 313-764-2364 Dept of Economics fax: 313-764-2364 Univ of Michigan http://gopher.econ.lsa.umich.edu Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220 ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 13:10:07 EDT Reply-To: V.AINSCOUGH@elsevier.nl Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Valerie Ainscough <v.ainscough@elsevier.nl> Subject: electronic journals/electronic subsciptions Please could someone help me. I'm trying to find out the difference between electronic journals and electronic subscriptions. I've seen various different definitions of each and it seems to be the more I find out the less I know! Anyone got any ideas or does anyone have the reference to an article which covers this subject. Thanks in advance. Valerie Ainscough Business Information Centre Elsevier Science ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 09:09:03 EDT Reply-To: "Efthimis N. Efthimiadis" <ene@argo.gslis.ucla.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: "Efthimis N. Efthimiadis" <ene@argo.gslis.ucla.edu> Subject: SIGIR-95: Text Encoding Standards Course Please excuse any duplication. From: ERASMUS@NTUVAX.NTU.AC.SG (Edie Rasmussen) ________________________________________________________ REUSABILITY, INTERCHANGEABILITY, AND COMPATIBILITY: ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS OF TEXT ENCODING STANDARDS Lou Burnard, Oxford University Judith Klavans, Columbia University C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, University of Illinois at Chicago A PRE-CONFERENCE COURSE to be held in association with SIGIR '95: 18th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval Seattle, WA, USA Saturday, July 8, 1995 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. ________________________________________________________ SIGIR '95, an international research conference on information retrieval theory, systems, practice and applications, will be held in Seattle, WA, from July 9-13. On the Saturday prior to the conference, a one-day course will be offered covering the theory and practice of markup languages for the representation of textual and other data, such as SGML and the Text Encoding Initiative. Taught by Lou Burnard, Judith Klavans, and C. M. Sperberg-McQueen. COURSE DESCRIPTION: The representation of textual data has raised serious problems since the early days of digital technology. Incompatibility between representations range from simple formatting issues, such as word delimitation, to data encoding schemes, such as 7-bit encoding for English, 8-bit for accented languages, up to 32-bit for Asian languages. Furthermore, the complications seem to be growing as the amount of digital data increases. Recognizing the predicament these complications cause in the information age, a group of researchers and practitioners, sponsored by the Association for Computational Linguistics, the Association for Computers and the Humanities, and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing, joined in 1988 to explore ways to resolve the serious emerging incompatibilities in the representation of text. The Text Encoding Initiative has addressed these problems by developing detailed SGML Document Type Definitions (DTDs) to achieve comprehensive and generalizable encoding standards for a range of data types, from verse to syntactic analyses, from spoken language to hypertext, from terminological data to multilingual corpora. This one-day course will consist of three parts: the first will describe the challenges raised by the three ``abilities'' which concern effective text representation: reusability, interchangeability, and compatibility. The next section of the course will present the types of data handled so far by the TEI encoding scheme, some of the problems already solved, some ongoing projects, and some unsettled questions. If hands-on is possible, we will provide a session to experience the strengths of using the TEI for building intelligent text data bases from existing on-line texts. Otherwise, we will demonstrate widely available software and discuss practical issues in using the TEI for building intelligent text data bases from existing on-line texts. The course will be of interest to: computer scientists who are building large test-beds of textual data, researchers who must analyze and encode representational systems over such data, practitioners who must solve the incompatibility problem by choosing a standard encoding scheme for textual data, SGML hackers who want to know more about TEI DTDs, humanists who want to learn more about the issues in text representation. Since most of IR currently operates over textual data, the indexing issues in the TEI are of particular and pressing interest to the IR audience. Further information can be found at: http://www.columbia.edu/~klavans/home.html http://www-tei.uic.edu/pub/tei/sigir.html Questions re workshop content should be directed to C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, u35395@uicvm.cc.uic.edu; addresses for queries re registration and accommodation are given below. MATERIALS AND PRESENTERS All participants will be provided with a printed introductory summary guide to the TEI scheme and supporting materials on PC disks, including full versions of the TEI DTDs, public domain SGML software and sample TEI texts. The electronic version of the Guidelines will also be provided. Lou Burnard, of Oxford University Computing Services, is the European editor of the TEI project. He has degrees in English literature from Oxford, and has worked in computers since the seventies. His areas of expertise are in the applications of computing to linguistic and literary research, particularly with reference to database and text retrieval systems. He has published and lectured widely on these and related topics. His present responsibilities, aside from TEI work, include management of the British National Corpus project at OUCS, and the Oxford Text Archive, of which he is Director. Judith Klavans is the Director of the Center for Research on Information Access (CRIA) at Columbia University. The goals of the Center, established in January 1995, are to integrate and coordinate the various digital library related activities at Columbia University, to push forward research on technologies related to information access, and to serve as a source of information on the technological aspects of digital library applications to external projects. Dr. Judith Klavans has a research career which combines aspects of computer science and linguistics, including the automatic acquisition of lexical knowledge, multilingual text analysis, and the development of symbolic techniques for the presentation of information within the context of digital libraries. C. M. Sperberg-McQueen is a senior research programmer at the academic computer center at the University of Illinois at Chicago; he currently works in the database group, on SGML applications and the university library's information arcade. Since 1988 he has been editor in chief of the ACH/ACL/ALLC Text Encoding Initiative. REGISTRATION: Cost of the course is $50 before May 29 and $65 after May 29 which includes a box lunch and course documentation. The attached registration form covers this course only. Attendance at SIGIR '95 is not required for this course. Those wishing to attend SIGIR as well should complete the separate SIGIR registration form; a copy plus full information on SIGIR '95, including descriptions of tutorials, workshops, all technical sessions, and accommodation, etc. is available from ftp.u.washington.edu (\public\sigir95\program) by anonymous ftp; or via WWW at URL: http://info.sigir.acm.org/ sigir/conferences/SIGIR_95_adv.pgm.html; or request a copy of the program by mail by contacting sigir95@u.washington.edu. The course venue will depend on enrolment but at present it is expected that it will be at the SIGIR conference hotel, the Seattle Sheraton Hotel & Towers, 1400 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. Details of conference accomodation are available from the ftp and www addreses above. Cut here: >-------------------------------------------------- SGML/TEI COURSE REGISTRATION FORM in conjunction with SIGIR '95 Seattle, WA, USA, July 8, 1995 Please use block letters or type, and tick where appropriate __ Mr. __ Ms. __ Dr. __ Prof. Other: ______ LAST NAME:________________ FIRST NAME:_______________________ BADGE NAME (if different): __________________________________ COMPANY/ORGANIZATION:________________________________________ ADDRESS:_____________________________________________________ CITY:__________________ STATE:______ ZIP CODE: __________ COUNTRY:_______________ PHONE: ( ___ )____________________ FAX: ( ___ ) _______________ EMAIL: ________________________ COURSE REGISTRATION FEE: $50 prior to May 29; $65 after May 29) $ ________________ DO YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL NEEDS? Please explain: ___________________________________________________________ ARE YOU ALSO ATTENDING SIGIR '95? ____ yes ____ no METHOD OF PAYMENT (US Currency only): __ Check payable to ACM/SIGIR95 __ Credit card (Visa, MC, AMEX) ____________________________________ Credit card number, expiration date ______________________________________ Signature, date (I authorize to charge my account fees indicated above) Return Registration Form by May 29 to qualify for early registration. Use fax or email (credit card payment) or mail check or credit card) to: SIGIR95 c/o Convention Services Northwest 1809 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1414 Seattle, WA 98101 USA Fax: +1 206-292-0559 Email: SIGIR95@aol.com (Registration queries to: +1 206-292-9198 (Ask for Sarah Amendola) ______________________________________________________________ Efthimis N. Efthimiadis Assistant Professor Department of Library and Information Science Graduate School of Education & Information Studies University of California at Los Angeles 241 GSE&IS Building, 152003 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1520 tel: 310-825-8975; fax: 310-206-4460; email: efthimis@gslis.ucla.edu ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 09:11:13 EDT Reply-To: Hughlook@hughlook.demon.co.uk Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Hugh Look <hughlook@hughlook.demon.co.uk> Organization: Myorganisation Subject: electronic journals/electronic subsciptions > > I'm trying to find out the difference between electronic journals and > electronic subscriptions. I've seen various different definitions of each > and it seems to be the more I find out the less I know! > > Anyone got any ideas or does anyone have the reference to an > article which covers this subject. > I don't think that you will find an authoritative definition for these. Usage is loose at the moment, although it may settle down. My own observation, based on usage, is: An electronic subscription is a way of getting the material of a journal in electronic as well as printed form. An electronic journal is a complete product, often including software, and does not usually have a print equivalent. By implication, the entire editorial process is carried out electronically as well as the journal being distributed electronically. I emphasise, though, that this is loose. There are several electronic journals that do have a print couterpart. A "pure" example is The Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials. I doubt that there will be much agreement about these definitions! -- Hugh Look: hughlook@hughlook.demon.co.uk Electronic publishing consultant. Editor, EPJournal: The International Electronic Publishing Newsletter ========================================================================= Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 08:54:33 EDT Reply-To: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Subject: Times Higher Education Supplement Friday May 12 an essay about electronic journals by Stevan Harnad, and a counter-essay by Steve Fuller will appear in the Times Higher Education Supplement, Multimedia Page. The first paragraph of each of these essays appears below. Both essays can be accessed through the World Wide Web at the URL: http://cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk:80/~harnad/THES/thes.html There is a reply to Fuller as well, and more commentaries are invited (see Instructions on the Web Page in question). The discussion will also be archived at the Times Higher Education Supplement's Gopher site: http://gopher.timeshigher.newsint.co.uk/ email: izitim@pavilion.co.uk (Tim Greenough, Multimedia, THES) THE POSTGUTENBERG GALAXY: HOW TO GET THERE FROM HERE Stevan Harnad Cognitive Sciences Centre Department of Psychology University of Southampton Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ It is time to stop making apocalyptic predictions about the coming of the electropublication era and to start providing concrete strategies for hastening the day. But before proposing anything, I have to describe in some detail an important parting of ways that will be taking place as the literature is launched into cyberspace: The "trade" literature (for want of a better word, though Shakespeare was hardly a tradesman) will go one way, whereas the "esoteric" literature (of specialised scholarly and scientific research) will go another. This esoteric/trade distinction must be clearly understood and kept in mind or none of what follows will make any sense... [see URL for rest] Commentary by Steve Fuller (University of Durham & University of Pittsburgh Steve.Fuller@durham.ac.uk fuller@vms.cis.pitt.edu) The electronic medium is undoubtedly revolutionizing academic communication. But it is still unclear who will benefit in the long term by this revolution. Since so much is up for grabs at this point, a clear sense of where we have come from is needed to make sense of where we might be going. To his credit, Stevan Harnad offers such an account, the "Faustian bargain", which is very much part of the folklore of academic life. Its image of the profit-driven publisher provides a convenient scapegoat and remedy for academics who feel that they never quite get their message across to all who could potentially benefit from it. Unfortunately, like all such self-serving stories, its grain of truth is buried under a mountain of mystification... [see URL for rest] ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 10:52:36 EDT Reply-To: AWEEDON@VAX2.LUTON.AC.UK Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Alexis Weedon <aweedon@vax2.luton.ac.uk> Subject: Call for papers Please cut and copy to other lists and noticeboards Call for papers for the second and third issues of *Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies* Interactivity For the second issue of Convergence we are seeking research papers which address the issues surrounding forms of *interactivity* in any area of the new media from cable and telecommunications to electronic publishing, multimedia and VR. The Internet For the third issue of the Journal we are seeking papers relating to research projects or case studies which explore the use and potential of the *internet* as a new media delivery system. Papers in any of the following areas are welcome: control and censorship, copyright, media policy, internet and education, gender and technology. The first issue will be available from mid May. Send your subscription to John Libbey & Co. Ltd., Journal Subscriptions, 13 Smiths Yard, Summerley Street, London. SW18 4HR. Tel +44 181 947 2777. Fax +44 181 947 2664. Institutional subscription rates: all countries (except N. America) surface mail #40; air mail #45. N. America surface mail USA$80, air mail USA$90. Private subscription rates: all countries (except N. America) surface mail #18, air mail #23. N. America surface mail USA$32, airmail USA$40. ISSN 1354-8565. _________________________________________________________________________ Convergence is a refereed academic journal which addresses the creative, social, political and pedagogical issues raised by the advent of new media technologies. Published biannually in paper form and adopting an inter- disciplinary approach Convergence will develop this area into an entirely new research field. The principal aims of Convergence are: - to develop critical frameworks and methodologies which enable the reception, consumption and impact of new technologies to be evaluated in their domestic, public and educational contexts - to contextualise the study of those new technologies within existing debates in media studies, and to address the specific implications of the increasing convergence of media forms - to monitor the conditions of emergence of new media technologies, their subsequent mass production and the development of new cultural forms - to promote discussion and analysis of the creative and educational potentials of those technologies, and to contextualise those cultural practices within wider cultural and political debates. Submission details: Two hard copies and where possible one disk copy (Macintosh Word5 compatible) of all articles should be sent to the editors with the following information attached separately: name, institution and address for correspondence, telephone, fax and email address. Papers should be typed on one side of the sheet with endnotes in accordance with the MLA style sheet (abbreviated form available on request). Authors should also enclose a 50 word biography and an abstract. Submission deadline for the second issue is 30th May 1995 for the third issue it is 30th September 1995. Proposals for articles or completed papers should be sent to: Julia Knight or Alexis Weedon, Editors, Convergence, School of Media Arts, University of Luton, 75 Castle Street, Luton, LU1 3AJ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 1582 34111, fax: + 44 1582 489014, email: Convergence @vax2.luton.ac.uk. Convergence is published by the University of Luton, School of Media Arts and John Libbey & Co. Ltd. ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 09:11:13 EDT Reply-To: JAMES TANNER <jamest@cas2.unt.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: JAMES TANNER <jamest@cas2.unt.edu> Organization: University of North Texas Subject: RSAP NEWS 6.1 (SPRING '95) ISSN: 1057-8188 RSAP NEWSLETTER (Research Society for American Periodicals) Volume 6, No. 1 (Spring 1995) E-MAIL VERSION Edited by James T. F. Tanner Department of English University of North Texas P.O. Box 5096 UNT Sta. Denton, TX 76203-0096 (817) 565-2134 FAX: (817) 369-8770 jamest@cas2.unt.edu RSAP OFFICERS Edward Chielens (Henry Ford Community College), President (2-year term: Expires 1995) Kenneth M. Price (Texas A&M University), President-Elect (2-year term: Expires 1995) Robert J. Scholnick (College of William & Mary), Immediate Past President James T. F. Tanner (University of North Texas), Secretary/Treasurer (2-year term: Expires 1996) RSAP ADVISORY BOARD James T. F. Tanner (University of North Texas), RSAP NEWSLETTER Editor (3-year term: Expires 1997) (Appointed by Officers and Advisory Board) Lawrence I. Berkove (University of Michigan, Dearborn) (3-year term: Expires 1996) Shelley Fisher Fishkin (University of Texas) (3-year term: Expires 1997) Richard Kopley (Pennsylvania State University) (3-year term: Expires 1997) Janice Simon (University of Georgia) (3-year term: Expires 1995) Sam G. Riley (Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University) (3-year term: Expires 1996) AMERICAN LITERATURE ASSOCIATION--ANNUAL CONFERENCE (1995) Because the Research Society for American Periodicals (RSAP) is affiliated with the American Literature Association and meets annually with the ALA, information concerning the ALA and its annual conference follows. The American Literature Association will hold its sixth annual conference at the Stouffer Harborplace Hotel in Baltimore, May 22-28, 1995 (Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of Memorial Day Weekend). Please note that sessions begin on Friday morning, May 26, and end late Saturday afternoon, May 28. As usual, the ALA will sponsor parties on the Thursday evening preceding the conference (May 25) and after the last session on Sunday. In addition, there will be special breakfast seminars with discussions led by distinguished scholars. Housing: The ALA room block at the conference hotel, the Stouffer Harborplace Hotel in Baltimore, went surprisingly quickly. If you wish to stay at the conference hotel, you can call them at 1-800- HOTELS1 or at 1-410-547-1200 and check their availability and rates. The primary overflow hotel is the Brookshire, an all-suites hotel across the street from the Stouffer, which is offering a special American Literature Association rate of $92 per single. If you wish to reserve one of these suites, you can call the Brookshire directly at 410-625-1300. You can call the Stouffer Hotel which should be able to provide information on overflow housing or listen to the message on the voice mail of Alfred Bendixen: 213-343-4291. If you need to reach Alfred Bendixen, you may fax him at 213-343- 6470, leave a clear message on his voice mail at 213-343-4291, his E- Mail at abendix@calstatela.edu, or try to call him directly at his office 213-343-4140. If you need to contact the conference director, Gloria Cronin, you can fax her at 801-373-4661, or e-mail her at croning@jkhbhrc.byu.edu. The conference fee is $40 ($10 for retired faculty, independent scholars, and graduate students). Send a check, payable to American Literature Association, c/o Alfred Bendixen, English Dept., California State Univ., L.A., 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90032-8110. ALA NOTES To get on the mailing list for the American Literature Association and to receive ALA Notes (Newsletter of the American Literature Association), send $20 to: Professor Alfred Bendixen Department of English California State University, Los Angeles 5151 State University Drive Los Angeles, CA 90032 RSAP SESSIONS AT ALA CONFERENCE IN BALTIMORE Friday, 26 May 1995 5:30-6:30 P.M. FORMING & REFORMING FICTION FOR THE 19TH-CENTURY PERIODICAL MARKETPLACE Stouffer Harborplace Hotel, Baltimore B Chair: Kenneth M. Price (Texas A&M University) 1. "'Without stopping to ring the bell...': How Fanny Fern's Newspaper Fictions Joined the American Family," Claire C. Pettengill, Univesity of Maryland 2. "The Medium or the Message? Priorities in Antebellum Print Culture," Ezra Greenspan, University of South Carolina 3. "How Authors Get Their Audiences: First Installments by Stowe, Twain, Hopkins, and Wharton," Michael Lund, Longwood College Saturday, 27 May 1995 9:00-10:20 A.M. THE EDITOR'S IMPRINT: 19TH-CENTURY PERIODICALS & THE CREATION OF AMERICAN LITERATURE Stouffer Harborplace Hotel, Baltimore B Chair: Edward Chielens, Henry Ford Community College 1. "Creating Readers, Shaping 'Middle Class' Literature: J. G. Holland's SCRIBNER'S MONTHLY," Robert J. Scholnick, College of William and Mary 2. "Charlotte Porter and Helen Clarke, POET-LORE, in Dialogue with Horace Traubel, CONSERVATOR," Sherry Ceniza, Texas Tech University 3. "Walter Hines Page at the ATLANTIC: Redefining the Editor's Role," Ellery Sedgwick, Longwood College Saturday, 27 May 1995 12:00-12:50 BUSINESS MEETING: RESEARCH SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN PERIODICALS Stouffer Harborplace Hotel, Maryland F Chair: Edward Chielens, Henry Ford Community College ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR RSAP AT THE 1995 ALA CONVENTION The two-year term of RSAP President, Edward Chielens, will end this year (1995). Kenneth M. Price, the President-Elect will automatically become President of the RSAP. Chielens will then automatically become the Immediate Past President. Janice Simon's term on the RSAP Advisory Board will end this year (1995). She must either be re-elected or replaced. You are encouraged to attend the RSAP Business Meeting, Saturday, 27 May 1995, Stouffer Harborplace Hotel, Maryland F Room, during the noon hour, 12:00-12:50. RSAP TREASURER'S REPORT James Tanner, Treasurer of the RSAP, will present the Treasurer's Report at the scheduled Business Meeting. A copy of the Treasurer's Report will be sent to each subscribing member of the Research Society for American Periodicals. RSAP NEWSLETTER The RSAP NEWSLETTER is the official organ of the Research Society for American Periodicals. Editor: James T. F. Tanner Managing Editor: Stephen D. Adams Book Review Editor: Judith Yaross Lee Associate Book Review Editor: Joseph Bernt Consulting Editor: Kim Martin Long Consulting Editor: Stephen D. Adams Production Editor: Jane L. Tanner Design Editor: Jane L. Tanner Bibliographer: Sam G. Riley Business Manager: Elizabeth E. Gunter Published semi-annually, the newsletter is financially supported by the Research Society for American Periodicals. The Editor is interested in considering for publication such items as very brief articles, notes and queries, bibliographical citations, Calls for Papers, announcements of forthcoming conferences, very brief book reviews, e-mail information of special importance, and news concerning the activities of individual RSAP members. E-Mail submissions are particularly encouraged. Grateful acknowledgment is made to the University of North Texas English Department, to the UNT College of Arts and Sciences, to the UNT Center for Texas Studies, and to the RSAP membership for financial, technical, and moral support. AMERICAN PERIODICALS: A JOURNAL OF HISTORY, CRITICISM, & BIBLIOGRAPHY EDITORIAL STAFF James T. F. Tanner, Editor Stephen D. Adams, Managing Editor Kim Martin Long, Consulting Editor Judith Yaross Lee, Book Review Editor Joseph Bernt, Associate Book Review Editor Sam G. Riley, Bibliographer Virgil R. Albertini, Assistant Bibliographer Donald A. Barclay, Assistant Bibliographer Joseph R. McElrath, Assistant Bibliographer Jane L. Tanner, Production Editor Elizabeth E. Gunter, Business Manager ADVISORY EDITORS Martha Banta (University of California, Los Angeles) Nina Baym (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) Lawrence I. Berkove (University of Michigan-Dearborn) Edward Chielens (Henry Ford Community College) Cathy N. Davidson (Duke University) Shelley Fisher Fishkin (University of Texas) Robert A. Gross (College of William & Mary) Philip F. Gura (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) David D. Hall (American Antiquarian Society) David B. Kesterson (University of North Texas) Richard Kopley (Pennsylvania State University-DuBois) Patricia Marks (Valdosta State College) Joel Myerson (University of South Carolina) Sheila Post-Lauria (University of Massachusetts, Boston) Kenneth M. Price (Texas A&M University) Sam G. Riley (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) Robert J. Scholnick (College of William & Mary) Janice Simon (University of Georgia) David E. E. Sloane (University of New Haven) William C. Spengemann (Dartmouth College) Alan Trachtenberg (Yale University) Mailed at Denton, TX. Postmaster: Send address changes to AMERICAN PERIODICALS, P.O. Box 5096 UNT Sta., Denton, TX 76203-0096. Volume 5 (1995) Copyright 1995 by University of North Texas Press USISSN 1054-7479 American Periodicals: A Journal of History, Criticism, and Bibliography (ISSN 1054-7479) is published annually by the Journals Division of the University of North Texas Press, in cooperation with the Department of English at the University of North Texas. Subscription rates: 1 year, $15; 2 years, $28; Student Rates: 1 year, $10; 2 years, $18. Advertising rates: $50 per full page, $25 per half page. Back issues: $15 each. Address all correspondence to The Editor, AMERICAN PERIODICALS, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 5096 UNT Sta., Denton, TX 76203-0096. Telephone: (817) 565-2134. FAX: (817) 369-8770. E-Mail: jamest@cas2.unt.edu. Indexed in the MLA INTERNATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY, ULRICH'S INTERNATIONAL PERIODICALS DIRECTORY, COMMUNICATIONS ABSTRACTS: AN INTERNATIONAL PERIODICALS DIRECTORY, COMMUNICATIONS ABSTRACTS: AN INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICE, and HISTORICAL ABSTRACTS AND AMERICA: HISTORY AND LIFE. AMERICAN PERIODICALS invites the submission of articles that treat any aspect of American periodicals, both magazines and newspapers, from the beginnings of American culture to the present. Submissions that treat such topics as the editorial policy, financing, production, readership, design, illustration, and circulation of one or more periodicals are welcome, as are those which explore the position of American periodicals within the larger culture. In particular, we welcome articles which, like the periodicals themselves, cross the boundaries of several disciplines and explore the complex ways that periodicals have shaped, and havae been shaped by, American culture. Book reviews, bibliographies, and notes of professional interest will be included. Manuscripts must conform to the latest edition of the MLA STYLE MANUAL, be typewritten, double-spaced (including quotations and offset material), and be limited to 6500 words. A 5.25 or 3.5 disk (WordPerfect 5.1) is required. Two hard copies of the manuscript, along with a self-addressed return envelope and postage (unattached) are also required. A brief biographical "blurb," specifying academic affiliation, recent publications, and scholarly activities should be furnished on a separate page. All submitted manuscripts are read by the Editor and two experts in the appropriate scholarly field. Book reviews (which should be sent to the Book Review Editor) must contain the book author's complete name, the title of the book (including the subtitle), the place of publication, the name of the publisher, the date of publication, the ISBN number, and the price of the book (both clothbound and paperbound, where relevant). All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to the Editor, AMERICAN PERIODICALS, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 5906 UNT Sta., Denton, TX 76203-0096. This journal is a member of CELJ the Conference of Editors of Learned Journals. ARTICLES ACCEPTED FOR AMERICAN PERIODICALS, VOL. 5 (1995) 1. David A. Copeland, "Virtuous and Vicious: The Dual Portrayal of Women in Colonial Newspapers" 2. Etsuko Taketani, "The NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW, 1815-1835: Inventing the American Past" 3. Charles Johanningsmeier, "Expanding the Scope of 'Periodical History' for Literary Studies: Irving Bacheller and His Newspaper Fiction Syndicate" 4. Sheila Post-Lauria, "Editorial Politics in Melville's 'Benito Cereno'" 5. Mary Ellen Zuckerman, "From Educated Citizen to Educated Consumer: The Good Citizenship and Pro-Advertising Campaigns in THE WOMAN'S HOME COMPANION" 6. Linda M. Clemmons, "'Nature Was Her Lady's Book': Ladies' Magazines, American Indians, and Gender, 1820-1859" E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR RSAP DISCUSSION GROUP RSAP members are encouraged to send their e-mail addresses to James Tanner, Secretary. We have not formed a LISTSERV on the Internet, though this is in the talking stage. Nevertheless a list of e-mail addresses of RSAP members and others interested in an American Periodicals Discussion Group will be quite useful in furthering the aims of the RSAP. Send e-mail addresses to the Secretary by posting an e-mail message to jamest@cas2.unt.edu or by regular mail or telephone. CALL FOR CONTRIBUTORS STUDIES IN NEWSPAPER AND PERIODICAL HISTORY seeks articles from Americanists for its 1996 hardcover volume. Subjects of interest include the history of the American press; authorship in America; audience studies; case studies of individual magazines, newspapers, editors, or publishers; newspaper or periodical treatments of issues in American culture or character; questions of copyright, contract, circulation, or serialization; and topics in illustration, layout, or design. Articles should be about 7500 words, in MLA style, and submitted by 2 June 1995. Contact Amy Aronson, Deputy Editor, Columbia University, 602 Philosophy Hall, New York, NY 10027, aba2.columbia.com. EDITOR NEEDED The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals is searching for a new editor for VICTORIAN PERIODICALS REVIEW. Send a letter of interest and vita to Christopher Dahl, Provost, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454-1450. PERIODICAL MISCELLANY Stephen Adams, Managing Editor for AMERICAN PERIODICALS, has accepted a position as Assistant Professor of English at Murray State University in Murray, Kentucky. Stephen is completing currently completing his Ph.D. dissertation (on T.S. Eliot) at the University of North Texas. Stephen will continue as a Consulting Editor. We wish him well. Ken Price, a UNT doctoral student in English, will assume the Managing Editor position, effective 1 September 1995. Kim Martin Long, former Managing Editor for AMERICAN PERIODICALS, has accepted a position as Assistant Professsor of English at Shippensburg State University in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania. Kim will continue as a Consulting Editor. She will be missed in the North Texas area. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUBSCRIPTION FORM AMERICAN PERIODICALS: A JOURNAL OF HISTORY, CRITICISM, & BIBLIOGRAPHY (Includes membership in the Research Society for American Periodicals) YES!! Please Enter my ___ Subscription ___ Renewal to AMERICAN PERIODICALS (Includes membership in the Research Society for American Periodicals) I enclose: ___$15 for one year ('95). ___ $28 for two years ('95/96) ___$10 (Student, 1995). ___$18 (Student, '95/96) ___ $ (Contribution) ___ $ (Other. Specify). NAME__________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS_______________________________________________________________ CITY________________________________STATE___________________ZIP_______ E-MAIL ADDRESS_______________________________PHONE___________________________ ACADEMIC AFFILIATION__________________FAX_____________________________ SPECIAL INTERESTS____________________________________________________ Make Checks Payable to RSAP and Mail to: Editor AMERICAN PERIODICALS University of North Texas P.O. Box 5096 UNT Sta. Denton, TX 76203-0096 THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GIFT SUBSCRIPTION FORM MERRY CHRISTMAS! CHRISTMAS 1995 Please send a gift subscription to AMERICAN PERIODICALS (issue of 1996) to the following named person: NAME__________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS_______________________________________________________________ CITY____________________________________STATE_____________ZIP_________ E-MAIL ADDRESS______________________________PHONE_____________________ ACADEMIC AFFILIATION__________________________________________________ SPECIAL INTERESTS_____________________________________________________ ***I enclose $15. (A special xmas card and acknowledgment will be sent to the receiver of the gift subscription). NAME AND ADDRESS OF DONOR: __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ Make checks payable to RSAP and mail to: Editor AMERICAN PERIODICALS University of North Texas P.O. Box 5096 UNT Sta. Denton, TX 76203-0096 THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONSTITUTION RESEARCH SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN PERIODICALS (Approved 24 May 1991) A copy of the Constitution of the Research Society for American Periodicals will be sent to each person who joins the Society. BYLAWS RESEARCH SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN PERIODICALS (Approved 24 May 1991) A copy of the Bylaws of the Research Society for American Periodicals will be sent to each person who joins the Society. Research Society for American Periodicals Founding Members Virgil R. Albertini Cathy N. Davidson Luanne Hicks Robert A. Bader Carl B. Davis Janet G. House Martha Banta Mary De Jong Nian-Sheng Huang Donald A. Barclay Tom Dickson Frank W. Jennings Roderick S. Barclay Joanne A. Dobson E. Claire Jerry Nancy Warner Barrineau Janet Dodd Rebecca J. Johnson Nina Baym Vic Doyno Robert M. Jones Paula Bennett Wallace B. Eberhard Stephen Karetzky Lawrence I. Berkove Dennis W. Eddings Ali Kashani Joseph P. Bernt Hendrik Edelman Charles O. Kates Glenn Blalock Jonathan R. Eller Mavis P. Kelsey, M.D. Cheryl D. Bohde Susan B. Fay Laura B. Kennelly Barbara Bradfield Ben Franklin Fisher David B. Kesterson Wesley A. Britton Shelley Fisher Fishkin Edward J. Keyes Joshua Brown Tahita Fulkerson Richard Kielbowcicz Ray B. Browne Richard D. Fulton Michael Kingston Jackson R. Bryer Susan R. Gannon Patricia C. Knight Willis J. Buckingham Ellen Gruber Garvey Richard Kopley Rita A. Capezzi Barbara J. Gastel Wanda Landry Michael L. Carlebach Susanne George Helen L. Leath Betty S. Carr Donald C. Green James W. Lee Sherry Ceniza Julie Greenblatt Judith Yaross Lee Richard R. Centing Sarah L. Greene William R. Linneman Jocelyn Chadwick-Joshua Ezra Greenspan Alfred G. Litton Edward Chielens Robert A. Gross Kent Ljungquist Boyd Childress Dorys C. Grover Kim Martin Long Carol Lea Clark M. Guilford-Kardell Michael C. Lund Barbara L. Cloud Elizabeth E. Gunter Anne Lundin Ann Colbert Philip F. Gura Kevin M. McCarthy Betsy Colquitt David D. Hall Joseph McElrath John J. Connell, Jr. Marina L. Hall Patty Mamula Allene Cooper Jane Haspel Shirley Marchalonis Pascal Covici, Jr. Bob Hays Bayly Ellen Marks Patricia Marks William C. Spengemann Ronald S. Marmarelli Norman E. Stafford John B. Mason Madeleine B. Stern Laurence W. Mazzeno Katina Strauch C. Menke Brenda M.W. Strickler Louise Montgomery Guy Szuberla Marilyn Moss James T. F. Tanner Joel Myerson Jane L. Tanner Cameron C. Nickels Terence A. Tanner Patricia Okker Stuart Tarr Anna R. Paddon Ruth Anne Thompson Scott Peeples Alan Trachtenberg Burton Pollin Lon W. Travis Thomas R. Pribek William J. Trzeciak Kenneth M. Price Michael C. Turco Richard Prosser Rosemary Van Arsdel Mary Reichardt J. Don Vann Carol Reuss Norman E. Vogt Sam G. Riley Clyde Wade Kenneth A. Robb Joseph R. Weaver Garyn G. Roberts Daniel A. Wells Eunice M. Roe Janice L. White Sandra Roff Annette White-Parks Gary F. Scharnhorst James G. Wieghart Dorey Schmidt Susan S. Williams Robert J. Scholnick Douglas R. Wilmes Ellery Sedgwick Thomas Wortham Janice Simon George L. Wrenn Carolyn M. Skopik Michael J. Wrona David E. E. Sloane Mary Ellen Zuckerman Harry Sova Mary K. Sparks Robert L. Spellman James T. F. Tanner Professor of English University of North Texas P.O. Box 13827, UNT Sta. Denton, TX 76203-6827 AUDITORIUM BUILDING, ROOM 316 (817) 565-2134 (Office) (817) 382-1661 (Home) (817) 565-2050 (Msg.) FAX: (817) 565-4355 FAX: (817) 369-8770 e-mail: jamest@cas2.unt.edu ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 09:11:36 EDT Reply-To: "Frank E. Harris" <fharri@osa.org> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: "Frank E. Harris" <fharri@osa.org> Subject: Optics Index/Optics Letters CD-ROM X-cc: preprint@e-math.ams.org Dear E-Journal listers, I thought this might be of interest to you. Besides the scientific content, the EBT Dynatext software used on this CD-ROM is one of the best programs for searching, viewing, and printing large SGML documents. Frank E. Harris Optical Society of America PRESS RELEASE OSA's first CD-ROM, combining the Optics Index 1917-1994 and Optics Letters 1994, has been shipping for about a month. The Optics Index, which is searchable on titles, authors, subject terms, volume, page number, and year, has aroused considerable interest and generated sales both to OSA members and to members of allied societies who need occasional access to OSA's Optics literature. The OSA Optics Index covers the journals Applied Optics 1962-1994, JOSA (The Journal of the Optical Society of America) 1917-1983, JOSA A 1984-1994, JOSA B 1984-1994, JoLT (The Journal of Lightwave Technology) 1983-1994, and Optics Letters 1977-1994. The Optics Letters portion of the CD-ROM contains the full 1994 year of the peer-reviewed journal Optics Letters, with figures, equations, tables, and full text. Since we showed the prototype of Optics Letters at the OSA Annual Meeting in October, 1994, we have made several improvements. Although the program was already fast, we have made it faster, and we have added the original page numbers to the header above the title of each article. Several user-friendly features help you to concentrate on retrieving information instead of interpreting complex functions. - Resize windows to jump effortlessly between the table of contents and the full text, including abstracts, equations, tables, and figures - Automatic word wrap - no columns spilling off the screen - Math, chemistry, and special characters are accurately displayed, the way you need them - Display figures within the text or in separate windows, as you prefer - Customize the typeface and size of text on screen for easy reading Compatible with PC/Windows, Macintosh, and Unix systems (Unix precompiled for SUN, HP, DEC, and Silicon Graphics workstations). The OSA member price for Optics Index 1917-1994 and Optics Letters 1994 is $85. The non-member individual price is $125, and libraries may have a single site license for $275. Please e-mail cust.serv@osa.org , phone 202/416-1907, or fax 202/416-6130 to order or for more information. Alan N. Tourtlotte OSA, Publications Department -- Frank E. Harris fharri@osa.org Optical Society of America fharris@aip.org 2010 Massachusetts AVE NW Phone - 202-416-1904 Washington, DC 20036-1023 http://192.239.36.3 ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 09:11:52 EDT Reply-To: Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca> Subject: A Universal Citation Database and Reform of Scholarly Communication I have written a draft of a paper entitled "A Universal Citation Database as a Catalyst for Reform in Scholarly Communication" and would appreciate comments on it. It is available on-line at http://fas.sfu.ca/1/projects/ElectronicLibrary/project/papers Robert D. Cameron, Associate Professor cameron@cs.sfu.ca School of Computing Science FAX: (604) 291-3045 Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6 ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 08:47:01 EDT Reply-To: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Ann Okerson <ann@cni.org> Subject: New Edition of Internet Journal Directory Available [This is being cross-posted to several lists.] Association of Research Libraries PRESS RELEASE May 18, 1995 Ann Okerson (ann@cni.org) ARL 5TH EDITION OF DIRECTORY OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE The Association of Research Libraries announces publication of the 5th Edition of the hard-copy standard reference work for serials on the Internet: the Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters, and Academic Discussion Lists. The extraordinary rate of expansion of microcomputers and linked networks as vehicles for scholarly exchange, along with growth in the rate of the use of the Internet, does not abate. The number of journals, newsletters, and serial-like academic publications continues to increase daily and scholarly communication expands in exciting new ways. Many journals, newsletters, and scholarly lists may be accessed free of charge through Internet and affiliated networks, along with those that are increasingly available via paid online subscription. Nonetheless, it is not always simple to find what is available. The new edition of the Directory is a compilation of entries for nearly 2500 scholarly lists and 675 electronic journals, newsletters, and related titles such as newsletter-digests -- an increase in size of over 40% since the 4th edition of April 1994 and 4.5 times since the 1st edition of July 1991. The Directory provides instructions for electronic access to each publication. The objective is to assist the user in finding relevant publications and connecting to them quickly, even if he or she is not completely versed in the full range of user-access systems. Diane Kovacs of the Kent State University Libraries continues to head the KSU team of individuals who collaboratively created the 5th edition's scholarly discussion lists and interest groups section. Principal compiler of the journals and newsletters section is Lisabeth A. King, Research Assistant for the ARL Office of Scientific & Academic Publishing, with support from Dru Mogge, Electronic Services Coordinator. Ann Okerson of the ARL/OSAP is overall project coordinator for the printed directory. The printed directory points to the widely available Kovacs files as the free-of-charge Internet sources for the discussion lists section. ARL made an abridged gopher version available in summer of 1994 and plans to create a World Wide Web directory in the summer of 1995. The 5th Edition is produced in 8.5 x 11 paperbound format in 770 pages. Scholarly lists are grouped by broad subject areas, and journals and newsletters are in alphabetical order. A substantial index of keywords, titles, and institutional affiliations is provided. As in the previous four years, frontmatter of value to electronic serial readers is included. Again, a scholarly article on electronic scholarly publications leads, followed by works commissioned for the ARL book. The article is Paul Ginsparg's (Los Alamos National Laboratories) detailed description of the widely High Energy Physics preprints server and the concepts behind it, revised and reprinted from a 1994 article in Computers in Physics. For the second year, Birdie MacLennan of the University of Vermont has prepared a listing and assessment of sites for electronic serials that are maintained by various organizations on the Internet. Charles Bailey of the University of Houston Libraries and Editor in Chief of a notable Internet journal, The PACS Review, has included a detailed bibliography on electronic publishing. Included again is Steve Outing's listing of newspapers available on the Internet, a thriving project he began in 1994 and continues to maintain and expand. The Association of Research Libraries is a not-for-profit organization representing 119 research libraries in the United States and Canada. Its mission is to identify and influence forces affecting the future of research libraries in the process of scholarly communication. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Office of Scientific & Academic Publishing 21 Dupont Circle, NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 202-296-2296 202-872-0884 (fax) 5th EDITION, 1994: $62.00 (All purchasers) $41.00 (Only to the 119 LIBRARIES that are members of the ARL) ALL ORDERS ADD Postage/shipping/handling *PER COPY* U.S.A. $ 5.00 Canada $ 6.00 ORDERS SHOULD BE PREPAID BY CHECK, MONEY ORDER, MASTERCARD OR VISA. ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 08:47:17 EDT Reply-To: AWEEDON@VAX2.LUTON.AC.UK Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: Alexis Weedon <aweedon@vax2.luton.ac.uk> Subject: Network journal publishing - advice Could I ask the lists advice? I am currently co-editing a paper journal on new technologies and am looking into the feasibility of putting it on-line accessible via the Internet, though probably (though not necessarily) held on a vms/vax system at the University of Luton Could anyone suggest suitable software, or give me references to comparisons between systems which would enable me to do this? Many thanks Alexis Weedon AWeedon@vax2.luton.ac.uk ========================================================================= Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 09:44:11 EDT Reply-To: "William C. Anderson" <wand@loc.gov> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: "William C. Anderson" <wand@loc.gov> Subject: CONSER documentation for e-serials This message has been cross-posted to several listservs, please excuse the duplication. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To: CONSRLST, SERIALST, COOPCAT, EMEDIA, VPI-EJ From: Bill Anderson, CONSER Specialist Re: Availability of CONSER documentation on *Remote Access Computer File Serials* Date: May 18th As many of you already know, the CONSER Program has been arduously working to develop documentation for cataloging electronic serials. (I'm sure you also understand some of the challenges in this area.) Module 31, *Remote Access Computer File Serials,* prepared by Melissa Beck (UCLA), is ready for publication and will appear in Update 3 of the _CONSER Cataloging Manual_, distributed by LC's Cataloging Distribution Service. This should appear sometime around ALA (i.e., June or July). We are also announcing electronic access to the module via two methods: * World Wide Web via *Tools for Serials Catalogers* URL=http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/eserials.html * FTP via LC's FTP site ftp ftp.loc.gov login as *anonymous* cd /pub/collections.services get concatman.e_serials.wp51 (Remember to enter </vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></dps@nlo.nlc-bnc.ca></david@arch.ping.dk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></david@arch.ping.dk></pine.3.89.9504281057.a539117766-0100000@carins.cariboo.bc.ca></david@arch.ping.dk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></david@arch.ping.dk></ann@cni.org></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ann@cni.org></bhb.pressbks@press.uchicago.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></bhb.pressbks@press.uchicago.edu></bk797@cnsibm.albany.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></bk797@cnsibm.albany.edu></richard_meyer.library#u#macs@office.library.trinity.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></richard_meyer.library#u#macs@office.library.trinity.edu></ci20@columbia.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ci20@columbia.edu></ann@cni.org></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ann@cni.org></gkealey@morgan.ucs.mun.ca></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></gkealey@morgan.ucs.mun.ca></review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></review@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu></ball@beast.trenton.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></guedon@ere.umontreal.ca></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></guedon@ere.umontreal.ca></amo@research.att.com></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu>prior to using the *get* command since this is in WordPerfect 5.1) Both the HTML and WordPerfect versions lack some of the figures included in the print format, but the textual content is complete. CONSER would like to express its sincere thanks to Ann Ercelawn for converting the WP version to HTML on such short notice (and for maintaining the *Tools for Serials Catalogers* home page--URL=http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/serials.html). For those of you who responded to messages distributed by CONSER members assisting with the module, **Thank you very much.** All the input was quite helpful in resolving (at least for now) some of the knotty issues. If policy decisions didn't come out quite the way you expected, well ... stay tuned, this is a rather fluid environment. ========================================================================= Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 09:46:02 EDT Reply-To: mwarren@anl.gov Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: mwarren@anl.gov Organization: Argonne National Laboratory Subject: Integrated Graphics Hello, This is Mary Warren, the manager of the Technical Communication Services Dept. at Argonne National Laboratory, a Department of Energy R&D laboratory. I joined this newsgroup to get some help with integrating graphics files (created with any number of different software packages on Macintoshes) into WordPerfect for Windows 6.1 text files on a Gateway PC. These merged files are then printed with a postscript printer. Does anyone have any advice about choosing the right formats to save the graphics files be ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 10:27:18 EDT Reply-To: James Powell <jpowell@borg.lib.vt.edu> Sender: Electronic Journal Publishing List <vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> From: James Powell <jpowell@borg.lib.vt.edu> Subject: Technology For All Americans X-cc: www-announce@www0.cern.ch The Scholarly Communications Project and The Technology For All Americans Project would like to announce the Technology For All Americans home page located at http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/TAA/TAA.html. Press Information April 20, 1995 Editorial Contact: Rick Satchwell Technology for All Americans Project 1997 S. Main Street, Suite 701 Blacksburg, VA 24061-0353 Phone: (703) 953-0203 Fax: (703) 953-0014 Email: T.Ed.Stan.Proj@bev.net Technology Education Standards ProjectTo Seek Input from Educators, Parents, Engineers What should a 12-year old girl know about technology? How much should she understand about genetic engineering, smart transportation systems, wireless communications, or robotics? By the year 2000, technology educators hope to have a literacy program in place for students in grades K through 12 to learn about this multi-faceted discipline. To reach this goal, a commission of experts in the field is currently attempting to define what the standards for technology will be. "Technology is more than having access to a computer in a classroom. It is the study of the world as it has been created by humans," says William E. Dugger, Jr., a professor of technology education on sabbatical from Virginia Tech. Dugger is directing the efforts of the commission who are working through a program entitled Technology for All Americans. The ambitious program is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The 22-member national commission met recently in Reston, Virginia, to discuss the first phase of their work -- the writing of a document that explains technology as a discipline and why technological literacy is important for all children and adults. This document will be a road map for the subsequent development of standards for the K-12 classroom. When the commission members have finished the document describing the need for technological education of the nation's youngsters, they will hold workshops around the country this summer. These hearings will be located at seven NASA centers. Hearings will also be held in the fall at regional and state technology, science, mathematics, and engineering association meetings. "It is extremely important to us to hear what the public has to say about teaching technology in the classroom," Dugger explained. "We want the input of engineers, teachers, parents, and anyone else who may have an opinion about technological literacy. We want to be able to reach a consensus about what these standards should be before they are adopted." The effort is similar to the standards project developed by the community of geographers. In the 1980s, it was decided that geography standards were needed in the schools. After building a consensus among the various interest groups, geography standards were put in place by 1994. Another model, developed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in 1989, is also being used by the commission. Dugger explained that the technology standards will mimic geography's model by actually implementing three sets of standards: grades K-4, 5-8, and 9-12. Similar to the geography project, the technology standards will be based on ongoing consensus, and they will seek out various political interests for input. For further information about the Technology for All Americans program, contact Dr. William E. Dugger, Jr., 1997 S. Main Street, Suite 701, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0353. Telephone: (703) 953-0203 Fax: (703) 953-0014 Email: T.Ed.Stan.Proj@bev.net # # # _________________________________________________________________ The Scholarly Communications Project home page is http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ TAA and many other electronic resources published by University Libraries, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, are available here. James Powell - Library Automation, University Libraries, VPI&SU jpowell@scholar.lib.vt.edu - NeXTMail welcome here Owner of VPIEJ-L, a discussion list for Electronic Journals Archives: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu:80/ gopher://scholar.lib.vt.edu:70/ file://scholar.lib.vt.edu/~ftp </jpowell@borg.lib.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></jpowell@borg.lib.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu> </wand@loc.gov></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></wand@loc.gov></aweedon@vax2.luton.ac.uk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ann@cni.org></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ann@cni.org></cameron@cs.sfu.ca></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></cameron@cs.sfu.ca></fharri@osa.org></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></fharri@osa.org></jamest@cas2.unt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></jamest@cas2.unt.edu></aweedon@vax2.luton.ac.uk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk></hughlook@hughlook.demon.co.uk></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ene@argo.gslis.ucla.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></ene@argo.gslis.ucla.edu></v.ainscough@elsevier.nl></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></hal@alfred.econ.lsa.umich.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu></dps@nlo.nlc-bnc.ca>